Emma Russell

461 total citations
22 papers, 261 citations indexed

About

Emma Russell is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Information Systems and Management and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Russell has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 261 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Social Psychology, 8 papers in Information Systems and Management and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Emma Russell's work include Personal Information Management and User Behavior (6 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (3 papers). Emma Russell is often cited by papers focused on Personal Information Management and User Behavior (6 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (3 papers). Emma Russell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Emma Russell's co-authors include Adrian P. Banks, Stephen A. Woods, Kevin Daniels, Gary Bosworth, Anita Füzi, Christine Grant, Polly Chapman, Jason Whalley, Tom Jackson and Joanna Yarker and has published in prestigious journals such as Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Computers in Human Behavior and Journal of Vocational Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Emma Russell

18 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emma Russell United Kingdom	9	108	74	58	40	35	22	261
Roman Souček Germany	7	86 0.8×	52 0.7×	76 1.3×	62 1.6×	40 1.1×	34	253
Yaxuan Ran China	8	108 1.0×	124 1.7×	98 1.7×	28 0.7×	21 0.6×	22	316
Aimei LI China	10	94 0.9×	136 1.8×	75 1.3×	26 0.7×	56 1.6×	37	323
Aldijana Bunjak Slovenia	8	58 0.5×	53 0.7×	72 1.2×	24 0.6×	44 1.3×	17	238
Adam Kay Australia	9	94 0.9×	78 1.1×	83 1.4×	26 0.7×	83 2.4×	17	295
Brian W. Tate United States	5	109 1.0×	76 1.0×	152 2.6×	43 1.1×	57 1.6×	5	276
Deshani B. Ganegoda Australia	9	114 1.1×	101 1.4×	165 2.8×	34 0.8×	39 1.1×	15	307
Julia Bayuk United States	8	73 0.7×	66 0.9×	24 0.4×	40 1.0×	21 0.6×	11	294
Tavleen Kaur South Korea	11	84 0.8×	78 1.1×	47 0.8×	30 0.8×	96 2.7×	20	393
Maira E. Ezerins United States	6	93 0.9×	102 1.4×	79 1.4×	10 0.3×	48 1.4×	14	296

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Russell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Russell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Russell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Russell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Russell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Russell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Russell. The network helps show where Emma Russell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Russell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Russell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Russell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Russell. Emma Russell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Russell, Emma, et al.. (2026). Legacy imprints and categorisation shifts: How interpretations of job demands and resources change in abrupt transitions to virtual work. Human Relations.

Russell, Emma & Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben. (2026). Conceptualizing personality traits as “resource catalysts”: An extension to the conservation of resources (COR) theory. Applied Psychology. 75(2).

Russell, Emma, Jacqueline O’Reilly, Constantin Blome, et al.. (2024). Moving away from, moving towards and moving against others: An adaptive multi-strategy approach to defend and build resources in self-protection mode. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 155. 104052–104052. 2 indexed citations

Rae, Charlotte L. & Emma Russell. (2024). How can a 4-day working week increase wellbeing at no cost to performance?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 29(1). 5–7.

Russell, Emma, et al.. (2023). Getting on top of work‐email: A systematic review of 25 years of research to understand effective work‐email activity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 97(1). 74–103. 6 indexed citations

Wallace, Claire, Margarita León, Jacqueline O’Reilly, et al.. (2023). Governmentality Versus Community: The Impact of the COVID Lockdowns. PubMed. 6(3). 223–240.

Bosworth, Gary, et al.. (2023). Rural co-working: New network spaces and new opportunities for a smart countryside. Journal of Rural Studies. 97. 550–559. 40 indexed citations

Russell, Emma, et al.. (2021). The work‐habits intervention model: A 12‐month study to change work‐email habits. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 94(4). 808–835. 1 indexed citations

Russell, Emma, Stephen A. Woods, & Adrian P. Banks. (2021). Tired of email? Examining the role of extraversion in building energy resources after dealing with work-email. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 31(3). 440–452. 7 indexed citations

10.

Füzi, Anita, et al.. (2021). How rural coworking hubs can facilitate well-being through the satisfaction of key psychological needs. Local Economy The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit. 36(7-8). 606–626. 21 indexed citations

11.

Grant, Christine & Emma Russell. (2020). Agile Working and Well-Being in the Digital Age. Pure (Coventry University). 23 indexed citations

12.

Russell, Emma, Tom Jackson, & Adrian P. Banks. (2019). Classifying computer-mediated communication (CMC) interruptions at work using control as a key delineator. Behaviour and Information Technology. 40(2). 191–205. 6 indexed citations

13.

Russell, Emma & Kevin Daniels. (2018). Measuring affective well-being at work using short-form scales: Implications for affective structures and participant instructions. Human Relations. 71(11). 1478–1507. 35 indexed citations

14.

Russell, Emma, et al.. (2018). Factors Influencing Uptake and Use of a New Health Information App for Young People. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 36(4). 222–240. 11 indexed citations

15.

Tinker, Anthea, et al.. (2017). THE BENEFITS AND BARRIERS OF EXERCISE FOR THE PHYSICAL HEALTH OF OLDER WOMEN. Research Portal (King's College London). 1–7. 9 indexed citations

16.

Russell, Emma. (2017). Strategies for effectively managing email at work. Research Repository (Kingston University London). 1 indexed citations

17.

Russell, Emma. (2013). Strategies and bad habits in dealing with email at work. Figshare. 1 indexed citations

18.

Russell, Emma, et al.. (2010). Overcoming barriers to physical activity among culturally and linguistically diverse older adults: A randomised controlled trial. 1 indexed citations

19.

Russell, Emma, et al.. (2009). Effects of pretraining on acquisition of novel configural discriminations in human predictive learning. Learning & Behavior. 37(4). 311–324. 5 indexed citations

20.

Russell, Emma, et al.. (2006). Describing the strategies used for dealing with email interruptions according to different situational parameters. Computers in Human Behavior. 23(4). 1820–1837. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact