Emely de Vet
- Applied Psychology top 0.2%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 62
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 40
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 41
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling 9
-
- Environmental Education and Sustainability 18
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 10
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 7
-
- Physical Activity and Health 8
- Co-authors
- Denise T. D. de RidderJohn de WitJohannes BrugF. Marijn StokJascha de NooijerMarieke A. AdriaanseBob M. FennisNanné K. de Vries
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)PLoS ONE (6 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emely de Vet
134 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
- Applied Psychology 1.4k
- General Decision Sciences 101
- Clinical Psychology 1.0k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.4k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 392
Countries citing papers authored by Emely de Vet
This map shows the geographic impact of Emely de Vet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emely de Vet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emely de Vet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emely de Vet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emely de Vet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emely de Vet. The network helps show where Emely de Vet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emely de Vet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 39 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 75 | |
| 15 | Which conceptualisations of autonomy are addressed in the ethical discussion on nudging | 2016 | 1 |
| 16 | "When the going gets tough, who keeps going?" : Measuring individual differences in sensitivity to ego-depletion | 2013 | 2 |
| 17 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 83 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 53 |
About Emely de Vet
Emely de Vet is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Clinical Psychology, having authored 141 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (62 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (41 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (40 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (18 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (10 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (9 papers), Physical Activity and Health (8 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.4k citations), General Decision Sciences (101 citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.0k citations). Emely de Vet has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Denise T. D. de Ridder, John de Wit, Johannes Brug, F. Marijn Stok, Jascha de Nooijer, Marieke A. Adriaanse, Bob M. Fennis, Nanné K. de Vries, Jacob C. Seidell and Maartje P. Poelman. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.