Emely de Vet
- Applied Psychology top 0.2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- Denise T. D. de RidderJohn de WitJohannes BrugF. Marijn StokJascha de NooijerMarieke A. AdriaanseBob M. FennisNanné K. de Vries
- Topics
- Behavioral Health and Interventions (62 papers)Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (41 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (40 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emely de Vet
134 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
- Applied Psychology 1.4k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.4k
- Clinical Psychology 1.0k
- General Health Professions 586
- Sociology and Political Science 553
Countries citing papers authored by Emely de Vet
This map shows the geographic impact of Emely de Vet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emely de Vet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emely de Vet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emely de Vet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emely de Vet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emely de Vet. The network helps show where Emely de Vet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emely de Vet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emely de Vet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emely de Vet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emely de Vet. Emely de Vet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 75 | |
| 15 | Which conceptualisations of autonomy are addressed in the ethical discussion on nudging | 1 |
| 16 | "When the going gets tough, who keeps going?" : Measuring individual differences in sensitivity to ego-depletion | 2 |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 83 | |
| 20 | 53 |
About Emely de Vet
Emely de Vet is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Clinical Psychology, having authored 141 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (62 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (41 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (40 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.4k citations), General Decision Sciences (101 citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.0k citations). Emely de Vet has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Denise T. D. de Ridder, John de Wit, Johannes Brug, F. Marijn Stok, Jascha de Nooijer, Marieke A. Adriaanse, Bob M. Fennis, Nanné K. de Vries, Jacob C. Seidell and Maartje P. Poelman. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.