Anke Oenema

145 papers receiving 7.3k citations

Hit Papers

Adherence to the Mediterranean diet among adults in Mediterranean countries: a systematic literature review 2022 · 103 citations
1032022202620232024255075100

Peers

Anke Oenema
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • Applied Psychology 2.3k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 3.1k
  • General Health Professions 2.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 1.5k
  • Pharmacy 293
Replace Lea Maes with:
Lea Maes Belgium
Debbe Thompson United States
James E. Cane United Kingdom
Laura Linnan United States
Paul A. Estabrooks United States
Janice Baranowski United States
Stephan U Dombrowski United Kingdom
Audie A. Atienza United States
Urte Scholz Switzerland
Sonia Lippke Germany
Anke Oenema relative to Lea Maes Belgium Lea Maes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lea Maes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anke Oenema

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anke Oenema's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anke Oenema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anke Oenema more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anke Oenema

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anke Oenema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anke Oenema. The network helps show where Anke Oenema may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anke Oenema, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anke Oenema Line = papers co-authored together Anke Oenema links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 151 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006444
2 2004401
3 2011367
4 2005334
5 2003291
6 2001243
7 2006198
8 2012194
9 2009194
10 2008173
11 2008168
12 2002164
13 2005138
14 2010128
15 2015126
16 2008119
17 2009115
18 2009113
19 2013110
20 2008109

About Anke Oenema

Anke Oenema is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Physiology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 151 papers that have together received 7.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (71 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (60 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (28 papers), Physical Activity and Health (26 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (21 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (21 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (16 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (2.3k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (3.1k citations), General Health Professions (2.5k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.5k citations) and Pharmacy (293 citations). Anke Oenema has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Johannes Brug, Klazine van der Horst, Isabel Ferreira, W. Brouwer, Willemieke Kroeze, Nanné K. de Vries, Jascha de Nooijer, Lilian Lechner, Rik Crutzen and Stef Kremers. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Appetite, Health Education Research and International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact