A.R.H. Fischer

6.5k total citations · 2 hit papers
115 papers, 4.5k citations indexed

About

A.R.H. Fischer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, A.R.H. Fischer has authored 115 papers receiving a total of 4.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 24 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 24 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in A.R.H. Fischer's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (24 papers), Risk Perception and Management (23 papers) and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (20 papers). A.R.H. Fischer is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral Health and Interventions (24 papers), Risk Perception and Management (23 papers) and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (20 papers). A.R.H. Fischer collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Portugal. A.R.H. Fischer's co-authors include Lynn J. Frewer, J.C.M. van Trijp, Hui Shan Tan, Markus Stieger, Hilde Tobi, L.P.A. Steenbekkers, Maarten Nauta, I.A. van der Lans, Gene Rowe and A.E.I. de Jong and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Cleaner Production.

In The Last Decade

A.R.H. Fischer

114 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance

2015 378 citations A.R.H. Fischer, L.P.A. Steenbekkers et al. Food Quality and Preference profile →
The future supply of animal-derived protein for human consumption

2012 377 citations A.R.H. Fischer et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
A.R.H. Fischer Netherlands	36	1.3k	794	752	724	718	115	4.5k
Duncan Hedderley New Zealand	43	2.0k 1.6×	630 0.8×	1.5k 2.0×	368 0.5×	454 0.6×	231	5.8k
Xavier Gellynck Belgium	48	2.3k 1.8×	328 0.4×	1.5k 2.0×	434 0.6×	480 0.7×	298	7.1k
Davide Menozzi Italy	29	952 0.7×	188 0.2×	991 1.3×	958 1.3×	812 1.1×	79	3.2k
Machiel J. Reinders Netherlands	25	864 0.7×	479 0.6×	637 0.8×	219 0.3×	244 0.3×	67	3.1k
Luís Guerrero Spain	49	3.3k 2.5×	246 0.3×	1.3k 1.8×	539 0.7×	219 0.3×	147	7.1k
Pieternel A. Luning Netherlands	45	3.7k 2.9×	244 0.3×	1.0k 1.4×	464 0.6×	399 0.6×	130	6.7k
Christina Hartmann Switzerland	46	2.7k 2.1×	349 0.4×	1.0k 1.4×	1.4k 1.9×	1.3k 1.9×	117	8.0k
Filiep Vanhonacker Belgium	33	1.8k 1.4×	280 0.4×	1.2k 1.6×	218 0.3×	226 0.3×	50	4.0k
Marleen C. Onwezen Netherlands	25	940 0.7×	394 0.5×	490 0.7×	324 0.4×	437 0.6×	50	3.4k
Hans Dagevos Netherlands	28	1.5k 1.2×	201 0.3×	745 1.0×	403 0.6×	351 0.5×	72	3.8k

Countries citing papers authored by A.R.H. Fischer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.R.H. Fischer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.R.H. Fischer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.R.H. Fischer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.R.H. Fischer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.R.H. Fischer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.R.H. Fischer. The network helps show where A.R.H. Fischer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A.R.H. Fischer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A.R.H. Fischer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A.R.H. Fischer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A.R.H. Fischer. A.R.H. Fischer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Fischer, A.R.H., et al.. (2025). (M)eat more plants: How category dimensions and inferences shape consumer acceptance of plant-based proteins. Food Quality and Preference. 127. 105434–105434. 1 indexed citations

Onwezen, Marleen C., et al.. (2025). “Planting” meat substitutes in the meat shelf: An online and two supermarket field experiments to explore the effect of placing meat substitutes next to meat. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 84. 104223–104223. 3 indexed citations

Fischer, A.R.H., et al.. (2024). Consumer acceptance of mycelium as protein source. Food Quality and Preference. 122. 105304–105304. 4 indexed citations

Will, Sabine, Nick Vangheluwe, A.R.H. Fischer, et al.. (2022). Communicating about plant breeding and genome editing in plants: Assessment of European stakeholders, sources, channels and content. Food and Energy Security. 12(1). 6 indexed citations

Fischer, A.R.H., et al.. (2022). The price of sustainability: How consumers trade-off conventional packaging benefits against sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. 365. 132739–132739. 33 indexed citations

Fischer, A.R.H., et al.. (2022). Same strategies – different categories: An explorative card-sort study of plant-based proteins comparing omnivores, flexitarians, vegetarians and vegans. Appetite. 180. 106315–106315. 17 indexed citations

Lin, Li & A.R.H. Fischer. (2022). Paradoxical consumers in four European countries: Meat-eating justification and willingness to pay for meat from animals treated by alternatives to surgical castration. Meat Science. 188. 108777–108777. 11 indexed citations

Stewart‐Knox, Barbara, Audrey Rankin, Brendan Bunting, et al.. (2021). Self-efficacy, habit strength, health locus of control and response to the personalised nutrition Food4Me intervention study. British Food Journal. 124(1). 314–330. 7 indexed citations

Lasschuijt, Marlou, Guido Camps, Ellen J. Van Loo, et al.. (2021). Short and Long-Term Innovations on Dietary Behavior Assessment and Coaching: Present Efforts and Vision of the Pride and Prejudice Consortium. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(15). 7877–7877. 8 indexed citations

10.

Macready, Anna L., Rosalind Fallaize, Laurie T. Butler, et al.. (2018). Application of Behavior Change Techniques in a Personalized Nutrition Electronic Health Intervention Study: Protocol for the Web-Based Food4Me Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols. 7(4). e87–e87. 10 indexed citations

11.

Fischer, A.R.H. & L.P.A. Steenbekkers. (2018). All insects are equal, but some insects are more equal than others. British Food Journal. 120(4). 852–863. 70 indexed citations

12.

Frewer, Lynn J., A.R.H. Fischer, Mary Brennan, et al.. (2015). Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 56(10). 1728–1745. 91 indexed citations

13.

Fischer, A.R.H., Amber Ronteltap, Sharron Kuznesof, et al.. (2014). Understanding Consumer Evaluations of Personalised Nutrition Services in Terms of the Privacy Calculus: A Qualitative Study. Public Health Genomics. 17(3). 127–140. 20 indexed citations

14.

Stewart‐Knox, Barbara, Audrey Rankin, Sharron Kuznesof, et al.. (2014). Promoting healthy dietary behaviour through personalised nutrition: technology push or technology pull?. Proceedings of The Nutrition Society. 74(2). 171–176. 14 indexed citations

15.

Frewer, Lynn J., G.A. Kleter, Mary Brennan, et al.. (2013). Genetically modified animals from life-science, socio-economic and ethical perspectives: examining issues in an EU policy context. New Biotechnology. 30(5). 447–460. 21 indexed citations

16.

Melnyk, Valentyna, Erica van Herpen, A.R.H. Fischer, & J.C.M. van Trijp. (2012). Tell me what to do when I am in a good mood, show me what to do when I am in a bad mood: Mood as a moderator of social-norm influence. Advances in consumer research. 40(1). 958–959. 1 indexed citations

17.

Melnyk, Vladimir, Erica van Herpen, A.R.H. Fischer, & J.C.M. van Trijp. (2011). To Think Or Not to Think: the Effect of Cognitive Deliberation on Social Norm Influence. Advances in consumer research. 38. 2 indexed citations

18.

Asselt, E.D. van, A.R.H. Fischer, A.E.I. de Jong, Maarten Nauta, & R. de Jonge. (2009). Cooking Practices in the Kitchen—Observed Versus Predicted Behavior. Risk Analysis. 29(4). 533–540. 39 indexed citations

19.

Nauta, Maarten, A.R.H. Fischer, E.D. van Asselt, et al.. (2008). Food Safety in the Domestic Environment: The Effect of Consumer Risk Information on Human Disease Risks. Risk Analysis. 28(1). 179–192. 76 indexed citations

20.

Frewer, Lynn J., A.R.H. Fischer, Paul J. Van den Brink, et al.. (2008). Potential for the Adoption of Probabilistic Risk Assessments by End-Users and Decision-Makers. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal. 14(1). 166–178. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact