Marlou Lasschuijt

534 total citations
24 papers, 372 citations indexed

About

Marlou Lasschuijt is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Marlou Lasschuijt has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 372 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 10 papers in Clinical Psychology and 6 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Marlou Lasschuijt's work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (15 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (6 papers). Marlou Lasschuijt is often cited by papers focused on Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (15 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (6 papers). Marlou Lasschuijt collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Marlou Lasschuijt's co-authors include Kathleen Keller, Laural English, Monica Mars, Cees de Graaf, Paul A.M. Smeets, Kees de Graaf, Markus Stieger, Guido Camps, S. Miquel-Kergoat and Stephen J. Wilson and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Journal of Nutrition and International Journal of Obesity.

In The Last Decade

Marlou Lasschuijt

21 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marlou Lasschuijt Netherlands 11 214 148 95 82 69 24 372
Emma J. Bertenshaw United Kingdom 11 164 0.8× 142 1.0× 116 1.2× 84 1.0× 102 1.5× 15 462
Sofia Bouhlal United States 12 198 0.9× 106 0.7× 180 1.9× 67 0.8× 101 1.5× 20 538
P.S. Hogenkamp Netherlands 10 202 0.9× 114 0.8× 265 2.8× 133 1.6× 118 1.7× 13 514
Una Masic United Kingdom 12 100 0.5× 114 0.8× 147 1.5× 61 0.7× 23 0.3× 22 431
Femke Rutters Netherlands 3 168 0.8× 116 0.8× 91 1.0× 43 0.5× 141 2.0× 5 374
Pey Sze Teo Singapore 15 323 1.5× 56 0.4× 178 1.9× 113 1.4× 90 1.3× 26 503
T. Thaler Switzerland 6 119 0.6× 85 0.6× 130 1.4× 160 2.0× 50 0.7× 8 341
Alexandra Bédard Canada 16 289 1.4× 118 0.8× 91 1.0× 83 1.0× 161 2.3× 36 574
Laura L. Wilkinson United Kingdom 13 252 1.2× 324 2.2× 93 1.0× 161 2.0× 57 0.8× 31 591
Sue Baic United Kingdom 5 140 0.7× 44 0.3× 156 1.6× 47 0.6× 126 1.8× 6 397

Countries citing papers authored by Marlou Lasschuijt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marlou Lasschuijt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marlou Lasschuijt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marlou Lasschuijt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marlou Lasschuijt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marlou Lasschuijt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marlou Lasschuijt. The network helps show where Marlou Lasschuijt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marlou Lasschuijt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marlou Lasschuijt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marlou Lasschuijt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marlou Lasschuijt. Marlou Lasschuijt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
3.
Camps, Guido, et al.. (2024). User Requirements in Developing a Novel Dietary Assessment Tool for Children: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Formative Research. 8. e47850–e47850. 2 indexed citations
5.
Stieger, Markus, et al.. (2024). Consistent effect of eating rate on food and energy intake across twenty-four ad libitum meals. British Journal Of Nutrition. 132(4). 535–546. 3 indexed citations
6.
Lasschuijt, Marlou, et al.. (2024). Rule-based systems to automatically count bites from meal videos. Frontiers in Nutrition. 11. 1343868–1343868. 3 indexed citations
7.
Lasschuijt, Marlou, et al.. (2023). Dietary Behavior Assessments in Children—A Mixed-Method Research Exploring the Perspective of Pediatric Dieticians on Innovative Technologies. Current Developments in Nutrition. 7(6). 100091–100091. 3 indexed citations
8.
Lasschuijt, Marlou, Guido Camps, Monica Mars, et al.. (2023). Speed limits: the effects of industrial food processing and food texture on daily energy intake and eating behaviour in healthy adults. European Journal of Nutrition. 62(7). 2949–2962. 10 indexed citations
9.
Lasschuijt, Marlou, Kees de Graaf, & Monica Mars. (2021). Effects of Oro-Sensory Exposure on Satiation and Underlying Neurophysiological Mechanisms—What Do We Know So Far?. Nutrients. 13(5). 1391–1391. 28 indexed citations
10.
Lasschuijt, Marlou, Guido Camps, Ellen J. Van Loo, et al.. (2021). Short and Long-Term Innovations on Dietary Behavior Assessment and Coaching: Present Efforts and Vision of the Pride and Prejudice Consortium. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(15). 7877–7877. 8 indexed citations
11.
Lasschuijt, Marlou, Monica Mars, Cees de Graaf, & Paul A.M. Smeets. (2020). Endocrine Cephalic Phase Responses to Food Cues: A Systematic Review. Advances in Nutrition. 11(5). 1364–1383. 23 indexed citations
12.
Lasschuijt, Marlou, Monica Mars, Cees de Graaf, & Paul A.M. Smeets. (2020). How oro-sensory exposure and eating rate affect satiation and associated endocrine responses—a randomized trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 111(6). 1137–1149. 28 indexed citations
13.
Lasschuijt, Marlou, et al.. (2019). Unaware of the amount consumed: Systematic error in estimating food- and drink intake. Physiology & Behavior. 209. 112591–112591. 1 indexed citations
14.
Krüsemann, Erna J Z, Marlou Lasschuijt, Cees de Graaf, et al.. (2018). Sensory analysis of characterising flavours: evaluating tobacco product odours using an expert panel. Tobacco Control. 28(2). 152–160. 16 indexed citations
15.
Lasschuijt, Marlou, Monica Mars, Cees de Graaf, & Paul A.M. Smeets. (2018). Exacting Responses: Lack of Endocrine Cephalic Phase Responses Upon Oro-Sensory Exposure. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 9. 332–332. 8 indexed citations
16.
Keller, Kathleen, Laural English, S. Nicole Fearnbach, et al.. (2018). Brain response to food cues varying in portion size is associated with individual differences in the portion size effect in children. Appetite. 125. 139–151. 20 indexed citations
17.
Lasschuijt, Marlou, Monica Mars, Markus Stieger, et al.. (2017). Comparison of oro-sensory exposure duration and intensity manipulations on satiation. Physiology & Behavior. 176. 76–83. 49 indexed citations
18.
Fearnbach, S. Nicole, Laural English, Marlou Lasschuijt, et al.. (2016). Brain response to images of food varying in energy density is associated with body composition in 7- to 10-year-old children: Results of an exploratory study. Physiology & Behavior. 162. 3–9. 21 indexed citations
19.
English, Laural, S. Nicole Fearnbach, Marlou Lasschuijt, et al.. (2016). Brain regions implicated in inhibitory control and appetite regulation are activated in response to food portion size and energy density in children. International Journal of Obesity. 40(10). 1515–1522. 23 indexed citations
20.
English, Laural, Marlou Lasschuijt, & Kathleen Keller. (2014). Mechanisms of the portion size effect. What is known and where do we go from here?. Appetite. 88. 39–49. 97 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026