Elisa Fredericks

424 citations
11 papers · 295 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Elisa Fredericks

9 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers

Elisa Fredericks
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Strategy and Management 190
  • Management Information Systems 87
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 54
  • Business and International Management 15
  • Marketing 55
Replace Lee-Hsuan Lin with:
Lee-Hsuan Lin Taiwan
Xinzhe Song China
Amy Blitz United States
Ed Nijssen Netherlands
Dominic Wilson United Kingdom
H.K. Tang Singapore
Mariana Giovanna Andrade Rojas United States
Mel Adams United States
Xiaoxuan Zhu China
Chongchong Lyu China
Elisa Fredericks relative to Lee-Hsuan Lin Taiwan Lee-Hsuan Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lee-Hsuan Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elisa Fredericks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elisa Fredericks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elisa Fredericks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elisa Fredericks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elisa Fredericks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elisa Fredericks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elisa Fredericks. The network helps show where Elisa Fredericks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Elisa Fredericks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elisa Fredericks Line = papers co-authored together Elisa Fredericks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2005130
2 2003101
3 200527
4 201126
5 20193
6 20152
7
Is co-location of new product development teams necessary?
20022
8
FROM MASS CUSTOMIZATION TO CUSTOMIZATION: AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL DIFFERENTIATION
20042
9 20211
10 20051
11 20140

About Elisa Fredericks

Elisa Fredericks is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Marketing, having authored 11 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), Product Development and Customization (2 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Technology Assessment and Management (1 paper), Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper), Construction Project Management and Performance (1 paper) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (190 citations), Management Information Systems (87 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (54 citations), Business and International Management (15 citations) and Marketing (55 citations). Elisa Fredericks has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Abbie Griffin, Debra Zahay, Thorvald Hærem, Mihai Niculescu, Timothy W. Aurand, Carol W. DeMoranville, Tanuja Singh, Vijaykumar Krishnan, Thomas J. Smith and Devaki Rau. Their work appears in journals such as Industrial Marketing Management, Journal of Small Business Strategy, Group & Organization Management, Journal of Product Innovation Management and The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact