Elaine Seymour

7.5k total citations · 4 hit papers
20 papers, 5.3k citations indexed

About

Elaine Seymour is a scholar working on Safety Research, Education and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Elaine Seymour has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 5.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Safety Research, 5 papers in Education and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Elaine Seymour's work include Career Development and Diversity (6 papers), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (2 papers) and Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (2 papers). Elaine Seymour is often cited by papers focused on Career Development and Diversity (6 papers), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (2 papers) and Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (2 papers). Elaine Seymour collaborates with scholars based in United States, Portugal and France. Elaine Seymour's co-authors include Shelley J. Correll, Sandra L. Laursen, Anne‐Barrie Hunter, Rui Pimenta, Barbara F. Fuller, Mark Connolly and Eileen Lob Lewis and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

In The Last Decade

Elaine Seymour

20 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Hit Papers

Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences 1997 2026 2006 2016 1997 2004 2006 2019 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elaine Seymour United States 16 3.1k 2.4k 1.1k 715 621 20 5.3k
Zahra Hazari United States 31 2.2k 0.7× 2.3k 1.0× 507 0.5× 528 0.7× 729 1.2× 90 4.1k
Philip M. Sadler United States 35 3.5k 1.2× 1.9k 0.8× 436 0.4× 621 0.9× 1.3k 2.1× 172 5.6k
Gerhard Sonnert United States 34 2.4k 0.8× 1.9k 0.8× 340 0.3× 580 0.8× 889 1.4× 133 4.7k
Robert H. Tai United States 31 2.9k 0.9× 2.0k 0.8× 256 0.2× 683 1.0× 1.0k 1.7× 91 5.1k
Alberto F. Cabrera United States 36 5.0k 1.6× 774 0.3× 310 0.3× 1.1k 1.6× 250 0.4× 91 6.0k
Anne‐Barrie Hunter United States 8 1.5k 0.5× 1.4k 0.6× 308 0.3× 467 0.7× 252 0.4× 13 2.5k
Erin A. Cech United States 27 901 0.3× 1.2k 0.5× 531 0.5× 533 0.7× 119 0.2× 67 3.5k
Mitchell J. Chang United States 24 2.5k 0.8× 1.2k 0.5× 187 0.2× 946 1.3× 201 0.3× 54 3.8k
Angela Calabrese Barton United States 41 4.4k 1.4× 1.2k 0.5× 160 0.1× 508 0.7× 1.4k 2.3× 144 6.2k
Lisa R. Lattuca United States 29 2.0k 0.7× 277 0.1× 1.1k 1.0× 213 0.3× 258 0.4× 87 3.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Elaine Seymour

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elaine Seymour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elaine Seymour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elaine Seymour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elaine Seymour

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elaine Seymour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elaine Seymour. The network helps show where Elaine Seymour may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elaine Seymour

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elaine Seymour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elaine Seymour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elaine Seymour. Elaine Seymour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Seymour, Elaine, et al.. (2019). Talking about Leaving Revisited. 223 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Connolly, Mark & Elaine Seymour. (2015). Why Theories of Change Matter. WCER Working Paper No. 2015-2.. 4 indexed citations
3.
Laursen, Sandra L., Elaine Seymour, & Anne‐Barrie Hunter. (2012). Learning, Teaching and Scholarship: Fundamental Tensions of Undergraduate Research. Change The Magazine of Higher Learning. 44(2). 30–37. 28 indexed citations
4.
Lewis, Eileen Lob & Elaine Seymour. (2012). Classroom Assessment Techniques Attitude Surveys. 1 indexed citations
5.
Seymour, Elaine, et al.. (2008). Key Challenges to the introduction of hydrogen—European stakeholder views. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 33(12). 3015–3020. 31 indexed citations
6.
Seymour, Elaine. (2008). Rebuttal to commentary. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 33(4). 1457–1458. 1 indexed citations
7.
Seymour, Elaine, et al.. (2007). Towards a hydrogen economy in Portugal. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 32(15). 3223–3229. 34 indexed citations
8.
Seymour, Elaine, et al.. (2007). Indicators of European public research in hydrogen and fuel cells—An input–output analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 32(15). 3212–3222. 29 indexed citations
9.
Hunter, Anne‐Barrie, Sandra L. Laursen, & Elaine Seymour. (2006). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education. 91(1). 36–74. 918 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Seymour, Elaine, et al.. (2005). Partners in Innovation: Teaching Assistants in College Science Courses. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 43 indexed citations
11.
Seymour, Elaine, et al.. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three‐year study. Science Education. 88(4). 493–534. 965 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Seymour, Elaine. (2001). Tracking the processes of change in US undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Science Education. 86(1). 79–105. 251 indexed citations
13.
Seymour, Elaine. (1999). The Role of Socialization in Shaping the Career‐Related Choices of Undergraduate Women in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Majors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 869(1). 118–126. 59 indexed citations
14.
Seymour, Elaine, et al.. (1997). Modes of thought, feeling, and action in infant pain assessment by pediatric nurses. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 12(1). 32–50. 17 indexed citations
15.
Correll, Shelley J., et al.. (1997). Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 26(5). 644–644. 2342 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Seymour, Elaine. (1995). The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Science Education. 79(4). 437–473. 246 indexed citations
17.
Seymour, Elaine. (1995). Guest Comment: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. American Journal of Physics. 63(3). 199–202. 31 indexed citations
18.
Seymour, Elaine. (1992). "The Problem Iceberg" in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education: Student Explanations for High Attrition Rates.. The journal of college science teaching. 21(4). 52 indexed citations
19.
Seymour, Elaine, et al.. (1991). Sources and consequences of satisfaction and dissatisfaction in nursing: findings from a national sample. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 28(2). 109–124. 50 indexed citations
20.
Seymour, Elaine, et al.. (1990). On My Own Terms: The Redefinition of Success in Nursing. Image the Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 22(2). 84–88. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026