Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences
19972.3k citationsShelley J. Correll, Elaine Seymour et al.Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviewsprofile →
Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three‐year study
2004965 citationsElaine Seymour, Anne‐Barrie Hunter et al.Science Educationprofile →
Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development
2006918 citationsAnne‐Barrie Hunter, Sandra L. Laursen et al.Science Educationprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Elaine Seymour
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Elaine Seymour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elaine Seymour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elaine Seymour more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elaine Seymour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elaine Seymour. The network helps show where Elaine Seymour may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elaine Seymour
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elaine Seymour.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elaine Seymour based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elaine Seymour. Elaine Seymour is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Seymour, Elaine, et al.. (2019). Talking about Leaving Revisited.223 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Connolly, Mark & Elaine Seymour. (2015). Why Theories of Change Matter. WCER Working Paper No. 2015-2..4 indexed citations
Seymour, Elaine. (2008). Rebuttal to commentary. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 33(4). 1457–1458.1 indexed citations
7.
Seymour, Elaine, et al.. (2007). Towards a hydrogen economy in Portugal. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 32(15). 3223–3229.34 indexed citations
Hunter, Anne‐Barrie, Sandra L. Laursen, & Elaine Seymour. (2006). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education. 91(1). 36–74.918 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Seymour, Elaine, et al.. (2005). Partners in Innovation: Teaching Assistants in College Science Courses. Medical Entomology and Zoology.43 indexed citations
11.
Seymour, Elaine, et al.. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three‐year study. Science Education. 88(4). 493–534.965 indexed citations breakdown →
Seymour, Elaine. (1992). "The Problem Iceberg" in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education: Student Explanations for High Attrition Rates.. The journal of college science teaching. 21(4).52 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.