E.J. Kok
Impact in
- Plant Science top 1%
- Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Biotechnology top 1%
- Transgenic Plants and Applications
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Genetically Modified Organisms Research 67
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance 6
-
- Transgenic Plants and Applications 13
- Co-authors
- H.A. Kuiper (19 shared papers)G.A. Kleter (22 shared papers)H.P.J.M. Noteborn (5 shared papers)Jeroen P. van Dijk (23 shared papers)Karl‐Heinz Engel (3 shared papers)Theo W. Prins (19 shared papers)Ingrid M. J. Scholtens (15 shared papers)Arne Holst‐Jensen (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (9 papers)Food and Chemical Toxicology (6 papers)Trends in Food Science & Technology (5 papers)Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (5 papers)Food Chemistry (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyChina
In The Last Decade
E.J. Kok
94 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
- Plant Science 2.2k
- Biotechnology 507
- Molecular Biology 2.3k
- Genetics 604
- Food Science 296
Countries citing papers authored by E.J. Kok
This map shows the geographic impact of E.J. Kok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.J. Kok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.J. Kok more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E.J. Kok
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.J. Kok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.J. Kok. The network helps show where E.J. Kok may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E.J. Kok, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 394 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 282 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 227 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 165 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 159 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 150 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 134 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 114 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 101 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 80 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 77 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 76 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 72 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 59 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 59 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 35 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 34 |
About E.J. Kok
E.J. Kok is a scholar working on Plant Science, Biotechnology, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Food Science, having authored 97 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetically Modified Organisms Research (67 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (43 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (17 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (16 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (15 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (13 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (6 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Resistance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (2.2k citations), Biotechnology (507 citations), Molecular Biology (2.3k citations), Genetics (604 citations) and Food Science (296 citations). E.J. Kok has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include H.A. Kuiper, G.A. Kleter, H.P.J.M. Noteborn, Jeroen P. van Dijk, Karl‐Heinz Engel, Theo W. Prins, Ingrid M. J. Scholtens, Arne Holst‐Jensen, Jaap Keijer and Martijn Staats. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Trends in Food Science & Technology, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.