Edwin Hartman

40 papers receiving 731 citations

Peers

Edwin Hartman
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Information Systems and Management 529
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 348
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 230
  • Strategy and Management 137
  • Demography 93
Replace F. Neil Brady with:
F. Neil Brady United States
Gerald F. Cavanagh United States
Ignacio Ferrero Spain
Christopher Michaelson United States
Craig P. Dunn United States
Betsy Stevens United States
Anke Arnaud United States
Wim Vandekerckhove United Kingdom
Phylis Mansfield United States
Mary Zey‐Ferrell United States
Edwin Hartman relative to F. Neil Brady United States F. Neil Brady's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
F. Neil Brady · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin Hartman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin Hartman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin Hartman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin Hartman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin Hartman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin Hartman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin Hartman. The network helps show where Edwin Hartman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Edwin Hartman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin Hartman Line = papers co-authored together Edwin Hartman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996139
2 2006132
3 199898
4 200756
5 201352
6 200847
7 198847
8 201244
9 201135
10 199428
11
A Logic for Strategy
198824
12 200121
13 199415
14 199214
15 197812
16 20018
17 19968
18 19768
19 20007
20 19987

About Edwin Hartman

Edwin Hartman is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and General Health Professions, having authored 43 papers that have together received 857 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (19 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (529 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (348 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (230 citations), Strategy and Management (137 citations) and Demography (93 citations). Edwin Hartman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Daniel R. Gilbert, R. Edward Freeman, Alejo José G. Sisón, Joan Fontrodona, John J. Mauriel, Sahotra Sarkar, D. W. Hamlyn, Martha C. Nussbaum, André Habisch and Matthias P. Hühn. Their work appears in journals such as Business Ethics Quarterly, Journal of Business Ethics, The Philosophical Review, Business and Professional Ethics Journal and Academy of Management Learning and Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact