Business Ethics Quarterly

1.3k papers and 42.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Business Ethics Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 42.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Business Ethics Quarterly usually cover Information Systems and Management (642 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (316 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (245 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in Business and Education (640 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (208 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (200 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Business Ethics Quarterly are R. Edward Freeman, Michael C. Jensen, Robert A. Phillips, Linda Klebe Treviño, Andrew C. Wicks, Kenneth E. Goodpaster, Robert C. Solomon, Geoff Moore, Archie B. Carroll and Guido Palazzo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Business Ethics Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Business Ethics Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Business Ethics Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Business Ethics Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Business Ethics Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Business Ethics Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Business Ethics Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025