Edward R. Amend

504 total citations
12 papers, 287 citations indexed

About

Edward R. Amend is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Edward R. Amend has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 287 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Edward R. Amend's work include Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (6 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers) and Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (2 papers). Edward R. Amend is often cited by papers focused on Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (6 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers) and Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (2 papers). Edward R. Amend collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Edward R. Amend's co-authors include James T. Webb, Mihyeon Kim, Heinz Neber, F. Richard Olenchak, Patricia Schuler, Sylvia B. Rimm, Linda Kreger Silverman, John D. Wasserman, Karen B. Rogers and Nancy M. Robinson and has published in prestigious journals such as SAGE Open, Roeper Review and Gifted Child Today.

In The Last Decade

Edward R. Amend

11 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Edward R. Amend United States	7	123	116	76	75	72	12	287
Lianne Hoogeveen Netherlands	9	119 1.0×	87 0.8×	41 0.5×	41 0.5×	57 0.8×	25	265
Deirdre V. Lovecky United States	7	167 1.4×	117 1.0×	33 0.4×	72 1.0×	66 0.9×	10	311
Terry W. Neu United States	7	94 0.8×	152 1.3×	41 0.5×	48 0.6×	80 1.1×	8	288
Alissa F. Doobay United States	7	49 0.4×	114 1.0×	122 1.6×	147 2.0×	55 0.8×	9	282
A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars Netherlands	8	50 0.4×	63 0.5×	65 0.9×	57 0.8×	188 2.6×	36	294
Gilbert MacKay United Kingdom	9	45 0.4×	93 0.8×	112 1.5×	80 1.1×	113 1.6×	17	315
Julie Webb United States	7	32 0.3×	116 1.0×	51 0.7×	72 1.0×	56 0.8×	10	260
Jacques‐Henri Guignard France	7	97 0.8×	41 0.4×	30 0.4×	54 0.7×	27 0.4×	12	163
Sandra B. Vanegas United States	10	44 0.4×	56 0.5×	142 1.9×	153 2.0×	91 1.3×	22	282
Lilianne Eninger Sweden	7	69 0.6×	54 0.5×	118 1.6×	192 2.6×	85 1.2×	16	358

Countries citing papers authored by Edward R. Amend

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward R. Amend's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward R. Amend with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward R. Amend more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward R. Amend

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward R. Amend. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward R. Amend. The network helps show where Edward R. Amend may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward R. Amend

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward R. Amend. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward R. Amend based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward R. Amend. Edward R. Amend is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Webb, James T., et al.. (2020). Doppeldiagnosen und Fehldiagnosen bei Hochbegabung. Hogrefe eBooks.

2.

Amend, Edward R.. (2018). Finding Hidden Potential. 66–82. 1 indexed citations

3.

Amend, Edward R., et al.. (2015). The Role of Clinical Psychologist. Gifted Child Today. 38(4). 243–245. 3 indexed citations

4.

Lovecky, Deirdre V., John D. Wasserman, Linda Kreger Silverman, et al.. (2013). Critical Issues in the Identification of Gifted Students With Co-Existing Disabilities. SAGE Open. 3(3). 38 indexed citations

5.

Webb, James T., et al.. (2011). Misdiagnosis and Dual Diagnoses of Gifted Children and Adults: ADHD, Bipolar, OCD, Asperger’s, Depression, and Other Disorders. Gifted and Talented International. 26(1-2). 173–174. 61 indexed citations

6.

Amend, Edward R., et al.. (2009). The Antecedents of Misdiagnosis: When Normal Behaviors of Gifted Children Are Misinterpreted As Pathological. Gifted Education International. 25(2). 131–143. 8 indexed citations

7.

Amend, Edward R., et al.. (2009). A Unique Challenge: Sorting Out the Differences between Giftedness and Asperger's Disorder. Gifted Child Today. 32(4). 57–63. 7 indexed citations

8.

Webb, James T., et al.. (2008). A Parent’s Guide to Gifted Children. Gifted and Talented International. 23(1). 155–158. 53 indexed citations

9.

Webb, James T., et al.. (2007). A Parent's Guide to Gifted Children. 20 indexed citations

10.

Webb, James T., et al.. (2006). Diagnosis or Misdiagnosis.. 18(2). 15–17. 5 indexed citations

11.

Amend, Edward R., et al.. (2006). Comments on Mika's critique of Hartnett, Nelson, and Rinn's article, “gifted or ADHD? The possibilities of misdiagnosis”. Roeper Review. 28(4). 249–251. 5 indexed citations

12.

Webb, James T., et al.. (2006). Misdiagnosis and Dual Diagnoses of Gifted Children and Adults: ADHD, Bipolar, OCD, Asperger’s, Depression, and Other Disorders. Gifted and Talented International. 21(2). 83–86. 86 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact