Roeper Review

1.8k papers and 20.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Roeper Review in the last decades have received a total of 20.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Roeper Review usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k papers), Education (689 papers) and Social Psychology (306 papers) specifically the topics of Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (863 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (319 papers) and Teacher Professional Development and Motivation (157 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Roeper Review are Robert J. Sternberg, Donna Y. Ford, Arthur J. Cropley, Maureen Neihart, Linda Kreger Silverman, John Baer, Miraca U. M. Gross, Paula Olszewski‐Kubilius, James C. Kaufman and David W. Chan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Roeper Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Roeper Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Roeper Review.

Countries where authors publish in Roeper Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Roeper Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Roeper Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roeper Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025