Edgar Chambers

9.4k total citations
240 papers, 6.9k citations indexed

About

Edgar Chambers is a scholar working on Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, Edgar Chambers has authored 240 papers receiving a total of 6.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 160 papers in Food Science, 72 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics and 67 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in Edgar Chambers's work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (111 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (67 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (46 papers). Edgar Chambers is often cited by papers focused on Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (111 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (67 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (46 papers). Edgar Chambers collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and South Korea. Edgar Chambers's co-authors include Delores H. Chambers, Jane Mertz Garcia, Koushik Adhikari, Kadri Koppel, Sandria Godwin, Ángel A. Carbonell‐Barrachina, Laura Vázquez‐Araújo, Uyen Thuy Xuan Phan, Brizio Di Donfrancesco and Megan Clark and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Molecules and Food Research International.

In The Last Decade

Edgar Chambers

234 papers receiving 6.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Edgar Chambers United States 47 3.7k 1.8k 1.5k 1.3k 753 240 6.9k
Harry T. Lawless United States 50 5.6k 1.5× 4.3k 2.5× 1.6k 1.1× 1.3k 1.0× 211 0.3× 133 9.7k
Lisa Methven United Kingdom 37 1.4k 0.4× 1.3k 0.8× 356 0.2× 600 0.5× 113 0.2× 150 3.6k
Duncan Hedderley New Zealand 43 2.0k 0.5× 1.0k 0.6× 305 0.2× 1.5k 1.1× 56 0.1× 231 5.8k
Susana Fiszman Spain 53 5.5k 1.5× 3.4k 1.9× 1.3k 0.9× 1.7k 1.3× 91 0.1× 188 8.2k
Wender L.P. Bredie Denmark 42 2.5k 0.7× 1.5k 0.8× 1.4k 0.9× 565 0.4× 37 0.0× 157 5.0k
M.A. Drake United States 67 9.6k 2.6× 3.8k 2.2× 4.3k 2.9× 1.3k 1.0× 66 0.1× 362 13.5k
Russell Keast Australia 45 2.5k 0.7× 4.0k 2.3× 607 0.4× 593 0.4× 27 0.0× 183 8.0k
Nathalie Martin Switzerland 38 2.2k 0.6× 1.5k 0.9× 464 0.3× 325 0.2× 135 0.2× 100 4.5k
Nazimah Hamid New Zealand 48 3.0k 0.8× 1.2k 0.7× 935 0.6× 1.1k 0.9× 34 0.0× 165 6.3k
Gilles Féron France 35 1.2k 0.3× 1.2k 0.7× 306 0.2× 281 0.2× 190 0.3× 129 3.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Edgar Chambers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edgar Chambers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edgar Chambers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edgar Chambers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edgar Chambers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edgar Chambers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edgar Chambers. The network helps show where Edgar Chambers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edgar Chambers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edgar Chambers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edgar Chambers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edgar Chambers. Edgar Chambers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chambers, Edgar, et al.. (2025). A Cross-Cultural Study of Health Interests and Pleasure by Consumers in 10 Countries. Foods. 14(21). 3615–3615.
2.
Chambers, Edgar, et al.. (2025). Korean consumers' perception of common Korean foods from different origins based on ethnocentrism. Food Quality and Preference. 130. 105551–105551. 1 indexed citations
3.
Chambers, Edgar, et al.. (2024). Unreliability of clustering results in sensory studies and a strategy to address the issue. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4.
4.
Sharma, Chetan, et al.. (2022). Open‐ended question method investigation: A study with mashed potatoes. Journal of Sensory Studies. 38(2). 1 indexed citations
5.
Chambers, Delores H., et al.. (2020). Differentiation of potato samples using a modified high identity traits (HITS) method is greater with trained panels than untrained. Journal of Sensory Studies. 36(1). 2 indexed citations
6.
Sharma, Chetan, et al.. (2020). Development of a lexicon to describe the sensory characteristics of a wide variety of potato cultivars. Journal of Sensory Studies. 35(4). 16 indexed citations
7.
Miller, R. K., et al.. (2018). Relationship between Descriptive Flavor and Texture Attributes on In-Home Consumer Acceptance of Ground Beef. Meat and Muscle Biology. 2(2). 7–8. 4 indexed citations
8.
Miller, R. K., et al.. (2017). The Flavor and Texture Attributes of Ground Beef. Meat and Muscle Biology. 1(3). 7–7. 1 indexed citations
9.
Kosa, Katherine, Sheryl Cates, Sandria Godwin, & Edgar Chambers. (2017). Barriers to Using a Food Thermometer When Cooking Poultry at Home: Results from a National Survey. Food Protection Trends. 37(2). 116–125. 8 indexed citations
10.
Phan, Uyen Thuy Xuan & Edgar Chambers. (2016). Application of An Eating Motivation Survey to Study Eating Occasions. Journal of Sensory Studies. 31(2). 114–123. 44 indexed citations
11.
Chambers, Edgar, et al.. (2014). Effect of Carriers on Descriptive Sensory Characteristics: A Case Study with Soy Sauce. Journal of Sensory Studies. 29(4). 272–284. 30 indexed citations
12.
Phan, Uyen Thuy Xuan, et al.. (2014). Accelerated vs. real time modeling for shelf life: an example with fortified blended foods. Science and Technology Development Journal. 17(3). 83–91. 1 indexed citations
13.
Koppel, Kadri, et al.. (2013). Cross-country comparison of pomegranate juice acceptance in Estonia, Spain, Thailand, and United States. Food Quality and Preference. 31. 116–123. 21 indexed citations
14.
Chambers, Edgar, et al.. (2013). Sensory Lexicon Development Using Trained Panelists in Thailand and the U.S.A.: Soy Sauce. Journal of Sensory Studies. 28(3). 248–255. 57 indexed citations
15.
Koppel, Kadri, Edgar Chambers, & Delores H. Chambers. (2011). Flavour and Acceptance of Estonian Cheeses. Agronomy Research. 9. 409–414. 2 indexed citations
16.
Adhikari, Koushik, et al.. (2009). Awareness of international/ethnic food amongst consumers in Bangkok, Thailand.. Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry. 2(4). 176–183. 1 indexed citations
17.
Park, Sunghun, M. P. Elless, Jungeun Park, et al.. (2008). Sensory analysis of calcium‐biofortified lettuce. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 7(1). 106–117. 56 indexed citations
18.
Yancey, E.J., Michael E. Dikeman, K.A. Hachmeister, Edgar Chambers, & George A. Milliken. (2005). Flavor characterization of top-blade, top-sirloin, and tenderloin steaks as affected by pH, maturity, and marbling1,2,3. Journal of Animal Science. 83(11). 2618–2623. 45 indexed citations
19.
Chambers, Edgar, et al.. (2000). Cognitive Strategies for Reporting Portion Sizes Using Dietary Recall Procedures. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 100(8). 891–897. 69 indexed citations
20.
Chambers, Edgar, et al.. (1993). Effects of honey type and level on the sensory and physical properties of an extruded honey-graham formula breakfast cereal. Cereal Foods World. 38(6). 418–425. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026