Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts
19976.4k citationsRonald K. Mitchell, Bradley R. Agle et al.Academy of Management Reviewprofile →
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts
19973.0k citationsRonald K. Mitchell, Bradley R. Agle et al.Academy of Management Reviewprofile →
Corporate Social Performance Revisited
19912.8k citationsDonna J. WoodAcademy of Management Reviewprofile →
Corporate Social Performance Revisited
19911.3k citationsDonna J. WoodAcademy of Management Reviewprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Donna J. Wood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donna J. Wood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donna J. Wood more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donna J. Wood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donna J. Wood. The network helps show where Donna J. Wood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donna J. Wood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donna J. Wood.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donna J. Wood based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Donna J. Wood. Donna J. Wood is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wood, Donna J., et al.. (2018). Stakeholder Identification and Salience After 20 Years: Progress, Problems, and Prospects. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
5.
Logsdon, Jeanne M. & Donna J. Wood. (2005). Confronting the Paradox: Morally Mature Management and Socially Efficient Political Economies. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society. 16. 142–147.
6.
Wood, Donna J., et al.. (2003). In Search of Theory. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society. 14. 169–178.1 indexed citations
7.
Wood, Donna J. & Jeanne M. Logsdon. (2002). Business Citizenship: From Individuals to Organizations. SSRN Electronic Journal.42 indexed citations
8.
Wood, Donna J. & Jeanne M. Logsdon. (2002). A Global Business Citizenship Process Model. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society. 13. 181–186.1 indexed citations
Wood, Donna J.. (1998). Essay Forum. Business & Society. 37(1). 60–112.3 indexed citations
12.
Mitchell, Ronald K., Bradley R. Agle, & Donna J. Wood. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review. 22(4). 853–853.2987 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Wood, Donna J.. (1997). From the Editor. Business & Society. 36(1). 3–4.1 indexed citations
14.
Wood, Donna J., et al.. (1995). Before-Profit Social Responsibility. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society. 6. 809–829.28 indexed citations
15.
Wood, Donna J. & Thomas M. Jones. (1994). From the Editors. Business & Society. 33(3). 235–235.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.