Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
19958.5k citationsMark C. SuchmanAcademy of Management Reviewprofile →
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
19955.9k citationsMark C. SuchmanAcademy of Management Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Suchman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Suchman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Suchman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Suchman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Suchman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Suchman. The network helps show where Mark C. Suchman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark C. Suchman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark C. Suchman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark C. Suchman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark C. Suchman. Mark C. Suchman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Suchman, Mark C. & Susanne C. Monahan. (2011). Whose HIPAA Is It Anyway? Privacy Law Compliance and Provider/Patient Communication in American Hospitals.1 indexed citations
4.
Suchman, Mark C., et al.. (2009). Hospitals, HIPAA and the Politics of PARO: Modeling and Measuring Heterogeneous Organizational Postures toward Legal Change.1 indexed citations
5.
Suchman, Mark C., et al.. (2009). A Profession of IT's Own: The Rise of Health Information Professionals in American Healthcare. 1–71.3 indexed citations
6.
Edelman, Lauren B. & Mark C. Suchman. (2007). The Interplay of Law and Organizations. Berkley Law Scholarship Repository (University of California, Berkeley).1 indexed citations
7.
Suchman, Mark C., et al.. (2001). The Legal Environment of Entrepreneurship: Observations on the Legitimation of Venture Finance in Silicon Valley. 349–382.20 indexed citations
8.
Edelman, Lauren B. & Mark C. Suchman. (1999). When the 'Haves' Hold Court: The Internalization of Disputing in Organizational Fields. Law & Society Review. 33.5 indexed citations
Suchman, Mark C.. (1998). Working Without a Net: The Sociology of Legal Ethics in Corporate Litigation. Fordham law review. 67(2). 837.19 indexed citations
Suchman, Mark C. & Lauren B. Edelman. (1996). Legal-Rational Myths: Lessons for the New Institutionalism from the Law and Society Tradition. Law & Social Inquiry. 21.6 indexed citations
13.
Suchman, Mark C., et al.. (1996). The Hired Gun as Facilitator: Lawyers and the Suppression of Business Disputes in Silicon Valley, 21 LAW & SOC. 74(1). 34–40.1 indexed citations
Suchman, Mark C.. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review. 20(3). 571–610.8528 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Suchman, Mark C.. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review. 20(3). 571–571.5924 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.