Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective
20014.2k citationsAbagail McWilliams, Donald S. SiegelAcademy of Management Reviewprofile →
Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?
20002.7k citationsAbagail McWilliams, Donald S. SiegelStrategic Management Journalprofile →
Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective
20012.3k citationsAbagail McWilliams, Donald S. SiegelAcademy of Management Reviewprofile →
Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications*
20062.2k citationsAbagail McWilliams, Donald S. Siegel et al.profile →
Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective
19941.4k citationsPatrick M. Wright, Abagail McWilliams et al.profile →
EVENT STUDIES IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ISSUES.
19971.3k citationsAbagail McWilliams, Donald S. Siegelprofile →
The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility
20081.3k citationsAbagail McWilliams, Donald S. Siegel et al.profile →
Creating and Capturing Value
2010655 citationsAbagail McWilliams, Donald S. SiegelJournal of Managementprofile →
The Resource-Based View of the Firm
1995321 citationsAbagail McWilliams, Dennis L. SmartJournal of Management Inquiryprofile →
Peers
Abagail McWilliams
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
Strategy and Management13.5k
Marketing7.6k
Accounting4.5k
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management3.4k
Citations per field, relative to Abagail McWilliams
Abagail McWilliams · 1×
×0.710.0kSM
×0.85.8kMARKE
×0.83.6kACCOU
×0.82.6kOBHRM
×0.51.1kEE
Citations per year, relative to Abagail McWilliams
Abagail McWilliams · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries citing papers authored by Abagail McWilliams
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Abagail McWilliams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abagail McWilliams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abagail McWilliams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Abagail McWilliams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Abagail McWilliams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Abagail McWilliams. The network helps show where Abagail McWilliams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Abagail McWilliams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Abagail McWilliams.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Abagail McWilliams based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Abagail McWilliams. Abagail McWilliams is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.