Didy Button

15 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

Didy Button
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Research and Theory 19
  • Leadership and Management 20
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 18
  • Physiology 126
  • Health Informatics 5
Replace Barbara Covington with:
Barbara Covington United States
Kay Hodson‐Carlton United States
Kay Hodson Carlton United States
Gregory A. DeBourgh United States
Mary Ellen Smith Glasgow United States
Jansirani Natarajan Oman
Heli‐Maria Kuivila Finland
Anne White United States
Jennifer O’Rourke United States
Rebecca Fountain United States
Didy Button relative to Barbara Covington United States Barbara Covington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Barbara Covington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Didy Button

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Didy Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Didy Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Didy Button more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Didy Button

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Didy Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Didy Button. The network helps show where Didy Button may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Didy Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Didy Button Line = papers co-authored together Didy Button links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2013167
2 2010108
3 202341
4 201835
5 202233
6 200719
7 202210
8 20126
9 20216
10 20224
11 20193
12 20162
13 20241
14 20231
15 20221
16 20260

About Didy Button

Didy Button is a scholar working on Physiology, General Health Professions, Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 16 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers), Nursing education and management (1 paper), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper), Educational Games and Gamification (1 paper) and Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (19 citations), Leadership and Management (20 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (18 citations), Physiology (126 citations) and Health Informatics (5 citations). Didy Button has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ann Harrington, Ingrid Belan, Moira Kelton, Karen Wotton, Sandra Goldsworthy, Liz McNeill, Pauline Glover, Tiffany Conroy, Catherine M. Laing and Anthony Maeder. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Nurse Education in Practice, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Clinical Simulation in Nursing and Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact