Robert M. Abrams

77 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Robert M. Abrams
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Pharmacy 258
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 207
  • Speech and Hearing 176
  • Sensory Systems 126
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 418
Replace Kenneth J. Gerhardt with:
Kenneth J. Gerhardt United States
Ze D. Jiang China
James F. Bosma United States
Roger R. Marsh United States
Steven M. Barlow United States
Sharon Freeman Israel
A. Salamy United States
Barbara S. Kisilevsky Canada
David H. McFarland Canada
D. Bartlett United States
Robert M. Abrams relative to Kenneth J. Gerhardt United States Kenneth J. Gerhardt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Kenneth J. Gerhardt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Abrams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Abrams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Abrams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Abrams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Abrams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Abrams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Abrams. The network helps show where Robert M. Abrams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Abrams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert M. Abrams Line = papers co-authored together Robert M. Abrams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201571
2 20070
3 20012
4 200049
5 19978
6 19965
7 199649
8 19967
9 19966
10 19963
11 19965
12 19955
13 199517
14 199312
15 199324
16 19924
17 199118
18 198717
19 19819
20
Preliminary Experiments on the Aural Significance of Parts of Tones of Orchestral Instruments and on Choral Tones
196316

About Robert M. Abrams

Robert M. Abrams is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Pharmacy, Sensory Systems, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Developmental Biology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Noise Effects and Management (19 papers), Infant Health and Development (13 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (12 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (8 papers), Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques (7 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (7 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (7 papers) and Thermoregulation and physiological responses (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (258 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (207 citations), Speech and Hearing (176 citations), Sensory Systems (126 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (418 citations). Robert M. Abrams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth J. Gerhardt, H. T. Hammel, Scott Griffiths, Fred T. Caldwell, David J. Burchfield, Molly C. Dougherty, Alastair A. Hutchison, James F. Clapp, William N. Spellacy and Jeff Longmate. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of low frequency noise, vibration and active control, Developmental Brain Research, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026