Bev OʼConnell

116 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Bev OʼConnell
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Research and Theory 80
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 95
  • Rehabilitation 337
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 198
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 136
Replace Bridie Kent with:
Bridie Kent United Kingdom
Diane L. Carroll United States
José Miguel Morales‐Asencio Spain
Mary Courtney Australia
Janita Pak Chun Chau Hong Kong
Barbara Resnick United States
Anne Williams Australia
Per‐Olof Sandman Sweden
Neville E. Strumpf United States
Maria Matarese Italy
Bev OʼConnell relative to Bridie Kent United Kingdom Bridie Kent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Bridie Kent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bev OʼConnell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bev OʼConnell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bev OʼConnell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bev OʼConnell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bev OʼConnell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bev OʼConnell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bev OʼConnell. The network helps show where Bev OʼConnell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bev OʼConnell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bev OʼConnell Line = papers co-authored together Bev OʼConnell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 119 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000159
2 200386
3 200477
4 200173
5 200272
6 199971
7 201271
8 200571
9 200170
10 200867
11 201663
12 200757
13 200354
14 200751
15 201041
16 200840
17 200540
18 201239
19 200335
20 200734

About Bev OʼConnell

Bev OʼConnell is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 119 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (33 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (13 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (9 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (8 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (80 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (95 citations), Rehabilitation (337 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (198 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (136 citations). Bev OʼConnell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joan Ostaszkiewicz, Jeanne Young, Linda Baker, Helen Myers, Wendy Penney, Cadeyrn J. Gaskin, Trisha Dunning, Mary Hawkins, Ben Edwards and Chantal F. Ski. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Nurse, International Journal of Nursing Practice, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia and Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026