Bev OʼConnell

3.1k total citations
119 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Bev OʼConnell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Surgery and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Bev OʼConnell has authored 119 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in General Health Professions, 19 papers in Surgery and 14 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in Bev OʼConnell's work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (33 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (13 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers). Bev OʼConnell is often cited by papers focused on Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (33 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (13 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers). Bev OʼConnell collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Bev OʼConnell's co-authors include Joan Ostaszkiewicz, Jeanne Young, Linda Baker, Helen Myers, Wendy Penney, Cadeyrn J. Gaskin, Trisha Dunning, Ben Edwards, Mary Hawkins and Chantal F. Ski and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Bev OʼConnell

116 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bev OʼConnell Australia 27 809 447 337 334 316 119 2.3k
Barbara Resnick United States 32 1.2k 1.5× 593 1.3× 267 0.8× 153 0.5× 314 1.0× 174 3.4k
Susan Kurrle Australia 30 731 0.9× 743 1.7× 196 0.6× 169 0.5× 208 0.7× 117 3.0k
Ulf Jakobsson Sweden 34 1.2k 1.4× 454 1.0× 137 0.4× 177 0.5× 393 1.2× 118 3.5k
Harry Crebolder Netherlands 29 1.2k 1.5× 547 1.2× 212 0.6× 214 0.6× 586 1.9× 76 3.2k
William Levack New Zealand 24 640 0.8× 496 1.1× 528 1.6× 194 0.6× 645 2.0× 110 2.2k
Dianne Groll Canada 27 618 0.8× 273 0.6× 124 0.4× 274 0.8× 341 1.1× 81 3.2k
Denise Kresevic United States 19 1.6k 2.0× 327 0.7× 118 0.4× 141 0.4× 531 1.7× 39 3.6k
Janita Pak Chun Chau Hong Kong 31 726 0.9× 454 1.0× 650 1.9× 164 0.5× 499 1.6× 161 2.8k
José Miguel Morales‐Asencio Spain 32 1.1k 1.4× 352 0.8× 144 0.4× 120 0.4× 402 1.3× 228 3.4k
Edward Duncan United Kingdom 23 1.4k 1.7× 457 1.0× 229 0.7× 272 0.8× 291 0.9× 86 3.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Bev OʼConnell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bev OʼConnell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bev OʼConnell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bev OʼConnell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bev OʼConnell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bev OʼConnell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bev OʼConnell. The network helps show where Bev OʼConnell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bev OʼConnell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bev OʼConnell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bev OʼConnell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bev OʼConnell. Bev OʼConnell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Crookes, Kate, et al.. (2022). Nurses’ perceptions of using volunteer support in health care settings: A systematic scoping review. International Nursing Review. 70(3). 405–414. 2 indexed citations
3.
Saunders, Rosemary, Kate Crookes, Mustafa Atee, et al.. (2021). Prevalence of frailty and pain in hospitalised adult patients in an acute hospital: a protocol for a point prevalence observational study. BMJ Open. 11(3). e046138–e046138. 3 indexed citations
4.
Ostaszkiewicz, Joan, et al.. (2014). Ethical challenges associated with providing continence care in residential aged care facilities: Findings from a grounded theory study. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 20(4). 179–186. 10 indexed citations
5.
Ostaszkiewicz, Joan, et al.. (2014). Providing continence care in long-term aged care facilities: Findings from a grounded theory study. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 1 indexed citations
6.
Islam, Tasneem, Bev OʼConnell, & Prabha Lakhan. (2013). Hospital readmission among older adults with congestive heart failure. Australian Health Review. 37(3). 362–368. 16 indexed citations
7.
Ostaszkiewicz, Joan, Bev OʼConnell, & Trisha Dunning. (2012). How is the quality of continence care determined in Australian residential aged care settings? A content analysis of accreditation reports. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 18(4). 102–109. 5 indexed citations
8.
Bucknall, Tracey, Daryl Jones, Rinaldo Bellomo, et al.. (2011). Point prevalence of patients fulfilling MET criteria in ten MET equipped hospitals. The methodology of the RESCUE study. Resuscitation. 82(5). 529–534. 8 indexed citations
9.
OʼConnell, Bev, et al.. (2008). The Tri‐focal model of care: Advancing the teaching‐nursing home concept. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 14(6). 411–417. 17 indexed citations
10.
Eastwood, Glenn M., Anne Gardner, & Bev OʼConnell. (2007). Low-flow oxygen therapy: selecting the right device.. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 15(4). 27–30. 5 indexed citations
11.
OʼConnell, Bev, Joan Ostaszkiewicz, & Chantal F. Ski. (2006). The development and trial of a best practice protocol for the management of urinary retention in elderly patients in acute and subacute care settings. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 93–93. 1 indexed citations
12.
Ostaszkiewicz, Joan, et al.. (2005). The challenge of managing continence care in residential aged care settings : recommendations for research and practice. 23(3). 5–18. 3 indexed citations
13.
Bailey, Susan, et al.. (2003). The transition from paediatric to adult health care services for young adults with a disability: an ethical perspective. Australian Health Review. 26(1). 64–69. 19 indexed citations
14.
Bailey, Susan, Sally Savage, & Bev OʼConnell. (2003). Volunteering and Social Capital in Regional Victoria.. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 8(2). 5–12. 5 indexed citations
15.
Young, Jeanne & Bev OʼConnell. (2001). Recovery following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in either a 23 hour or an 8 hour facility. 21(1-2). 2–7. 10 indexed citations
16.
OʼConnell, Bev & Helen Myers. (2001). A failed fall prevention study in an acute care setting: Lessons from the swamp. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 7(2). 126–130. 25 indexed citations
17.
OʼConnell, Bev, et al.. (2001). Challenges of measuring and linking patient outcomes to nursing interventions in acute care settings. Nursing and Health Sciences. 3(3). 113–117. 14 indexed citations
18.
OʼConnell, Bev, et al.. (2000). Nurses’ perceptions of the nature and frequency of aggression in general ward settings and high dependency areas. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 9(4). 602–610. 159 indexed citations
19.
OʼConnell, Bev, et al.. (2000). Documenting and communicating patient care: Are nursing care plans redundant?. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 6(5). 276–280. 24 indexed citations
20.
OʼConnell, Bev, Jeanne Young, & Di Twigg. (1999). Patient satisfaction with nursing care: A measurement conundrum. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 5(2). 72–77. 71 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026