Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Mathematics in the streets and in schools
1985623 citationsTerezinha Nunes Carraher, David W. Carraher et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by David W. Carraher
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David W. Carraher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David W. Carraher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David W. Carraher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David W. Carraher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David W. Carraher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David W. Carraher. The network helps show where David W. Carraher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David W. Carraher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David W. Carraher.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David W. Carraher based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David W. Carraher. David W. Carraher is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schliemann, Analúcia D., et al.. (2013). From seeing points to seeing intervals in number lines and graphs. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 223–243.3 indexed citations
5.
Carraher, David W. & Analúcia D. Schliemann. (2012). A compreensão de frações como magnitude relativa. Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa. 8(1). 67–78.2 indexed citations
Schliemann, Analúcia D., David W. Carraher, & Bárbara M. Brizuela. (2007). Bringing out the Algebraic Character of Arithmetic: From Children's Ideas to Classroom Practice [with CD-ROM]..7 indexed citations
Schliemann, Analúcia D., et al.. (2003). Algebra in Elementary School.. Proceedings of the ... PME Conference. 4. 127–134.43 indexed citations
11.
Carraher, David W. & Darrell Earnest. (2003). Guess My Rule Revisited.. Proceedings of the ... PME Conference. 2. 173–180.12 indexed citations
12.
Carraher, David W. & Analúcia D. Schliemann. (2002). The Transfer Dilemma. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 11(1). 1–24.88 indexed citations
13.
Schliemann, Analúcia D., David W. Carraher, & Bárbara M. Brizuela. (2000). From Quantities to Ratio, Functions, and Algebraic Relations 1.2 indexed citations
14.
Carraher, David W., et al.. (1999). Writing in Video.. Hand. 22(2). 4–7.2 indexed citations
15.
Carraher, David W., et al.. (1995). Graphing from Everyday Experience.. Hand. 18(2). 7.9 indexed citations
Carraher, Terezinha Nunes & David W. Carraher. (1988). Mathematics as personal and social activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 3(S1). 63–68.3 indexed citations
19.
Carraher, Terezinha Nunes, David W. Carraher, Analúcia D. Schliemann, & Analúcia D. Schliemann. (1987). Written and Oral Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 18(2). 83–83.88 indexed citations
20.
Carraher, Terezinha Nunes, David W. Carraher, & Analúcia D. Schliemann. (1982). Na vida dez; na escola zero: os contextos culturais da aprendizagem da matemática.. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 79–86.51 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.