David Sexton

730 total citations
40 papers, 577 citations indexed

About

David Sexton is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Education and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, David Sexton has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 577 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Clinical Psychology, 11 papers in Education and 10 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in David Sexton's work include Family and Disability Support Research (20 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (9 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (8 papers). David Sexton is often cited by papers focused on Family and Disability Support Research (20 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (9 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (8 papers). David Sexton collaborates with scholars based in United States, Qatar and Bulgaria. David Sexton's co-authors include Bruce Thompson, Patricia Snyder, Karen M. La Paro, Sarintha Stricklin, James M. Ernest, James H. Miller, Jerry Aldridge, Barbara Wolfe, Mary McLean and Katherine McCormick and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Abuse & Neglect, Educational and Psychological Measurement and Journal of Personality Assessment.

In The Last Decade

David Sexton

39 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Sexton United States 16 330 228 122 104 73 40 577
Katherine McCormick United States 14 247 0.7× 236 1.0× 79 0.6× 112 1.1× 55 0.8× 29 481
Rud Turnbull United States 12 345 1.0× 184 0.8× 89 0.7× 138 1.3× 67 0.9× 29 565
Barbara Clark United States 7 163 0.5× 291 1.3× 94 0.8× 121 1.2× 40 0.5× 13 579
Martha Blue-Banning United States 13 612 1.9× 511 2.2× 83 0.7× 86 0.8× 110 1.5× 20 857
Maria Timberlake United States 10 299 0.9× 128 0.6× 45 0.4× 46 0.4× 75 1.0× 12 487
Dana K. Donohue South Africa 10 159 0.5× 258 1.1× 62 0.5× 72 0.7× 125 1.7× 16 512
Larry M. Bolen United States 14 133 0.4× 157 0.7× 33 0.3× 145 1.4× 32 0.4× 41 468
Su‐Je Cho United States 12 304 0.9× 279 1.2× 22 0.2× 76 0.7× 83 1.1× 26 541
Irving Lazar United States 6 271 0.8× 501 2.2× 87 0.7× 156 1.5× 60 0.8× 18 769
Wendi Beamish Australia 15 310 0.9× 272 1.2× 35 0.3× 113 1.1× 77 1.1× 54 623

Countries citing papers authored by David Sexton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Sexton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Sexton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Sexton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Sexton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Sexton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Sexton. The network helps show where David Sexton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Sexton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Sexton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Sexton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Sexton. David Sexton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sexton, David, et al.. (2002). Comparing the Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP) Beliefs of Practitioners in General and Special Early Childhood Service Settings. Teacher Education and Special Education The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children. 25(3). 247–261. 5 indexed citations
2.
Sexton, David, et al.. (1999). Learning Accomplishment Profile-Diagnostic Standardized Assessment (LAP-D). Diagnostique. 24(1-4). 183–196. 29 indexed citations
3.
Sexton, David, et al.. (1998). Applying Q Methodology to Investigations of Subjective Judgments of Early Intervention Effectiveness. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. 18(2). 95–107. 31 indexed citations
4.
Paro, Karen M. La, David Sexton, & Patricia Snyder. (1998). Program quality characteristics in segregated and inclusive early childhood settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 13(1). 151–167. 45 indexed citations
5.
Thompson, Bruce, et al.. (1997). Correlates of the Quality of Life of Adults With Severe or Profound Mental Retardation. Mental Retardation. 35(5). 329–337. 39 indexed citations
6.
Sexton, David, et al.. (1996). Early Intervention Inservice Training Strategies: Perceptions and Suggestions from the Field. Exceptional Children. 62(6). 485–495. 36 indexed citations
7.
Thompson, Bruce, et al.. (1995). Measurement Characteristics of the Perceived Adequacy of Resources Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 55(2). 249–257. 3 indexed citations
8.
Sexton, David. (1994). Family-Driven Early Intervention.. Dimensions of early childhood. 22(2). 14–18. 6 indexed citations
9.
Thompson, Bruce, et al.. (1994). Predicting child abuse potential across family types. Child Abuse & Neglect. 18(12). 1039–1049. 44 indexed citations
10.
Snyder, Patricia, et al.. (1993). Evaluating the Psychometric Integrity of Instruments Used in Early Intervention Research. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. 13(2). 216–232. 29 indexed citations
11.
Sexton, David, et al.. (1992). Measuring Stress in Families of Children with Disabilities. Early Education and Development. 3(1). 60–66. 21 indexed citations
12.
Thompson, Bruce, et al.. (1992). The Measurement Integrity of Data Collected Using the Child Abuse Potential Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 52(4). 993–1001. 2 indexed citations
13.
Sexton, David, et al.. (1990). Measurement Characteristics of the Inventory of Parent Experience Scales. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. 10(1). 36–49. 7 indexed citations
14.
Sexton, David, et al.. (1989). Measurement characteristics of a short form of the questionnaire on resources and stress.. PubMed. 94(3). 331–9. 25 indexed citations
15.
Thompson, Bruce, et al.. (1989). Structure of a Short Form of the Questionnaire on Resources and Stress: A Bootstrap Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 49(2). 409–419. 8 indexed citations
16.
Sexton, David, et al.. (1987). Comparison of the MCMI and MMPI-168 as Psychiatric Inpatient Screening Inventories. Journal of Personality Assessment. 51(3). 388–398. 16 indexed citations
17.
Sexton, David, James H. Miller, & Anthony F. Rotatori. (1985). Determinants of Professional-Parental Agreement for the Developmental Status of Young Handicapped Children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 3(4). 377–390. 7 indexed citations
18.
Sexton, David, et al.. (1984). Multisource Assessment of Young Handicapped Children: A Comparison. Exceptional Children. 50(6). 556–558. 15 indexed citations
19.
Sexton, David, et al.. (1984). Correlates of Parental-Professional Congruency Scores in the Assessment of Young Handicapped Children. 8(2). 99–106. 10 indexed citations
20.
Koppa, R J, Monica McDermott, Charles D. Raab, & David Sexton. (1983). Human factors analysis of automotive adaptive equipment for disabled drivers. Journal of Safety Research. 14(3). 137–137. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026