Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by David Lasagabaster
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David Lasagabaster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Lasagabaster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Lasagabaster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Lasagabaster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Lasagabaster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Lasagabaster. The network helps show where David Lasagabaster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Lasagabaster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Lasagabaster.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Lasagabaster based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Lasagabaster. David Lasagabaster is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Doiz, Aintzane, et al.. (2019). The integration of language and content in English-medium instruction courses: Lecturers’ beliefs and practices. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 151–176.20 indexed citations
Lasagabaster, David, Aintzane Doiz, & Víctor Pavón Vázquez. (2018). Undergraduates 'beliefs about the rafe of language and team teaching in EMI courses al university. 50(2). 111–127.1 indexed citations
Nussbaum, Luci, John Bates, Aintzane Doiz, et al.. (2013). Universitats internacionals i plurilingües? : entre les polítiques i les pràctiques a les universitats de Catalunya. 1–100.
Sierra, Juan Manuel & David Lasagabaster. (2008). Los programas AICLE en aulas diversas: ¿una alternativa para todos?. Lenguaje y Textos. 131–142.3 indexed citations
14.
Lasagabaster, David & Ángel Huguet Canalís. (2007). Multilingualism in European bilingual contexts : language use and attitudes. Multilingual Matters eBooks.25 indexed citations
15.
Lasagabaster, David. (2005). La presencia de tres lenguas en el currículo: multilingüísmo en los contesto canadiense y español. Revista de educación. 405–426.3 indexed citations
Lasagabaster, David. (2003). Trilingüismo en la enseñanza: actitudes hacia la lengua minoritaria, la mayoritaria y la extranjera.18 indexed citations
18.
Lasagabaster, David. (2002). Towards an interface of language and literature. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 21–34.1 indexed citations
19.
Lasagabaster, David. (2001). La observación de la clase de L2. Revista de Psicodidáctica. 2(11). 67–86.
20.
Lasagabaster, David. (1998). Metalinguistic awareness and the learning of english as an L3. Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos. 20(2). 69–80.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.