Dashmaa Dashdorj

707 citations
14 papers · 571 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Dashmaa Dashdorj

12 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers

Dashmaa Dashdorj
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Animal Science and Zoology 493
  • Food Science 197
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 111
  • Insect Science 50
  • Biotechnology 25
Replace J. M. Hodgen with:
J. M. Hodgen United States
J. W. S. Yancey United States
Aurora Cittadini Spain
Anna C.V.C.S. Canto Brazil
Katarzyna Kajak‐Siemaszko Poland
Ida Krestine Straadt Denmark
Jason T. Sawyer United States
Janet Stark Australia
Juhui Choe South Korea
Young Sik Bae South Korea
Dashmaa Dashdorj relative to J. M. Hodgen United States J. M. Hodgen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
J. M. Hodgen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dashmaa Dashdorj

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dashmaa Dashdorj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dashmaa Dashdorj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dashmaa Dashdorj more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dashmaa Dashdorj

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dashmaa Dashdorj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dashmaa Dashdorj. The network helps show where Dashmaa Dashdorj may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Dashmaa Dashdorj, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dashmaa Dashdorj Line = papers co-authored together Dashmaa Dashdorj links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2015270
2 2016124
3 201363
4 201323
5 201621
6 201919
7 201113
8 201811
9 201810
10 20129
11 20125
12 20183
13 20230
14 20230

About Dashmaa Dashdorj

Dashmaa Dashdorj is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Food Science, Molecular Biology and Physiology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (12 papers), Food Quality and Safety Studies (5 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (3 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (3 papers), Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (2 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Assays (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (493 citations), Food Science (197 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (111 citations), Insect Science (50 citations) and Biotechnology (25 citations). Dashmaa Dashdorj has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Mongolia and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Inho Hwang, Touseef Amna, Hoa Van Ba, Vinay Tripathi, Soo‐Hyun Cho, Younghoon Kim, Byung-Wook Cho, Kang-Seok Seo, Ki-Hwan Lee and Da-Woon Jeong. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Production Science, European Food Research and Technology, Journal of Animal Science and Technology, Food Science of Animal Resources and Animal Science Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact