Daniel Zöller
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Susanne A. DenhamElizabeth A. CouchoudMary Ann CookAndreas HothoFlorian LemmerichIsiaah CrawfordStephan DoerfelRobert Jäschke
- Topics
- Recommender Systems and Techniques (6 papers)Complex Network Analysis Techniques (5 papers)Early Childhood Education and Development (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Daniel Zöller
16 papers receiving 533 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Clinical Psychology 414
- Education 305
- Social Psychology 204
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 182
- Sociology and Political Science 79
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Zöller
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Zöller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Zöller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Zöller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Zöller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Zöller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Zöller. The network helps show where Daniel Zöller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Zöller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Zöller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Zöller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Zöller. Daniel Zöller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | Leveraging User-Interactions for Time-Aware Tag Recommendations. | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | Evaluating Assumptions about Social Tagging - A Study of User Behavior in BibSonomy. | 2 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | TAX REFORM FOR TAX COMPETITION: WHICH ALTERNATIVES SHOULD BE USED? | 4 |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 391 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 92 | |
| 17 | 22 |
About Daniel Zöller
Daniel Zöller is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Information Systems and Accounting, having authored 17 papers that have together received 614 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Recommender Systems and Techniques (6 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (5 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (414 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (182 citations) and Pharmacy (68 citations). Daniel Zöller has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Susanne A. Denham, Elizabeth A. Couchoud, Mary Ann Cook, Andreas Hotho, Florian Lemmerich, Isiaah Crawford, Stephan Doerfel, Robert Jäschke, Gerd Stumme and Samuel Kounev. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychology, British Journal of Developmental Psychology and Journal of Informetrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.