H. Jane Rogers

2.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
20 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

H. Jane Rogers is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Computer Networks and Communications and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, H. Jane Rogers has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 9 papers in Computer Networks and Communications and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in H. Jane Rogers's work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (12 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (8 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers). H. Jane Rogers is often cited by papers focused on Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (12 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (8 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers). H. Jane Rogers collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. H. Jane Rogers's co-authors include Hariharan Swaminathan, Ronald K. Hambleton, John Hattie, Russell Jones, Devin M. Kearns, Taylor A. Koriakin, Jill L. Adelson, D. Betsy McCoach, Lyn Littlefield and Warren Cann and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Frontiers in Psychology and Educational and Psychological Measurement.

In The Last Decade

H. Jane Rogers

19 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Re... 1990 2026 2002 2014 1990 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
H. Jane Rogers United States 11 871 471 278 262 259 20 1.4k
Seock‐Ho Kim United States 22 867 1.0× 589 1.3× 280 1.0× 364 1.4× 184 0.7× 61 1.6k
T. C. Oshima United States 19 569 0.7× 331 0.7× 184 0.7× 316 1.2× 123 0.5× 42 982
Akihito Kamata United States 18 328 0.4× 203 0.4× 156 0.6× 192 0.7× 184 0.7× 72 1.2k
DE Ayala United States 2 318 0.4× 166 0.4× 175 0.6× 144 0.5× 286 1.1× 4 1.3k
Sun‐Joo Cho United States 19 331 0.4× 220 0.5× 177 0.6× 288 1.1× 189 0.7× 75 1.1k
Michael L. Nering United States 12 409 0.5× 215 0.5× 137 0.5× 138 0.5× 115 0.4× 18 901
R. J. De Ayala United States 17 438 0.5× 256 0.5× 129 0.5× 180 0.7× 158 0.6× 38 832
Barbara G. Dodd United States 18 493 0.6× 294 0.6× 137 0.5× 130 0.5× 152 0.6× 60 900
Vicente Ponsoda Spain 16 401 0.5× 164 0.3× 259 0.9× 100 0.4× 175 0.7× 57 1.3k
William H. Angoff United States 18 456 0.5× 165 0.4× 179 0.6× 171 0.7× 290 1.1× 53 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by H. Jane Rogers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Jane Rogers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Jane Rogers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Jane Rogers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Jane Rogers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Jane Rogers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Jane Rogers. The network helps show where H. Jane Rogers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Jane Rogers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Jane Rogers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Jane Rogers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Jane Rogers. H. Jane Rogers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lombardi, Allison, Graham G. Rifenbark, H. Jane Rogers, et al.. (2022). Establishing Construct Validity of a Measure of Adolescent Perceptions of College and Career Readiness. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. 46(1). 4–14. 10 indexed citations
2.
Rogers, H. Jane, et al.. (2021). Treatments of Differential Item Functioning: A Comparison of Four Methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 82(2). 225–253. 10 indexed citations
3.
Adelson, Jill L., et al.. (2017). Developing and Applying the Propensity Score to Make Causal Inferences: Variable Selection and Stratification. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 1413–1413. 26 indexed citations
4.
Kearns, Devin M., et al.. (2016). Semantic and Phonological Ability to Adjust Recoding: A Unique Correlate of Word Reading Skill?. Scientific Studies of Reading. 20(6). 455–470. 32 indexed citations
5.
Swaminathan, Hariharan, et al.. (2011). Research Methodology for Decision-Making in School Psychology. Oxford University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations
7.
Hattie, John, et al.. (1996). An Assessment of Stout's Index of Essential Unidimensionality. Applied Psychological Measurement. 20(1). 1–14. 70 indexed citations
8.
Rogers, H. Jane & Ronald K. Hambleton. (1994). MH: A Fortran 77 Program to Compute the Mantel-Haenszel Statistic for Detecting Differential Item Functioning. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 54(1). 101–104. 4 indexed citations
9.
Rogers, H. Jane & Hariharan Swaminathan. (1993). A Comparison of Logistic Regression and Mantel-Haenszel Procedures for Detecting Differential Item Functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement. 17(2). 105–116. 226 indexed citations
10.
Hambleton, Ronald K., Russell Jones, & H. Jane Rogers. (1993). Influence of Item Parameter Estimation Errors in Test Development. Journal of Educational Measurement. 30(2). 143–155. 41 indexed citations
11.
Swaminathan, Hariharan & H. Jane Rogers. (1990). Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression Procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement. 27(4). 361–370. 824 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Rogers, H. Jane & Ronald K. Hambleton. (1989). Evaluation of Computer Simulated Baseline Statistics for Use in Item Bias Studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 49(2). 355–369. 9 indexed citations
13.
Hambleton, Ronald K. & H. Jane Rogers. (1989). Detecting Potentially Biased Test Items: Comparison of IRT Area and Mantel-Haenszel Methods. Applied Measurement in Education. 2(4). 313–334. 92 indexed citations
14.
Hambleton, Ronald K. & H. Jane Rogers. (1989). Solving criterion-referenced measurement problems with item response models. International Journal of Educational Research. 13(2). 145–160. 7 indexed citations
15.
Hambleton, Ronald K. & H. Jane Rogers. (1988). Design of an Item Bias Review Form: Issues and Questions.. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 59(1). 25–31. 2 indexed citations
16.
Hambleton, Ronald K. & H. Jane Rogers. (1988). Detecting Biased Test Items: Comparison of the IRT Area and Mantel-Haenszel Methods.. 3 indexed citations
17.
Rogers, H. Jane & John Hattie. (1987). A Monte Carlo Investigation of Several Person and Item Fit Statistics for Item Response Models. Applied Psychological Measurement. 11(1). 47–57. 20 indexed citations
18.
Hambleton, Ronald K. & H. Jane Rogers. (1986). Promising Directions for Assessing Item Response Model Fit to Test Data.. 5 indexed citations
19.
Hambleton, Ronald K. & H. Jane Rogers. (1986). Technical Advances in Credentialing Examinations. Evaluation & the Health Professions. 9(2). 205–229. 5 indexed citations
20.
Hattie, John & H. Jane Rogers. (1986). Factor models for assessing the relation between creativity and intelligence.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 78(6). 482–485. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026