H. Jane Rogers

19 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Re...19902026200220141990250500750

Peers

H. Jane Rogers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Management Science and Operations Research 871
  • Computer Networks and Communications 471
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 278
  • Statistics and Probability 262
  • Education 259
Replace Seock‐Ho Kim with:
Seock‐Ho Kim United States
T. C. Oshima United States
DE Ayala United States
R. J. De Ayala United States
Michael L. Nering United States
Akihito Kamata United States
Sun‐Joo Cho United States
William H. Angoff United States
Barbara G. Dodd United States
Steffi Pohl Germany
H. Jane Rogers relative to Seock‐Ho Kim United States Seock‐Ho Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Seock‐Ho Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Jane Rogers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Jane Rogers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Jane Rogers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Jane Rogers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Jane Rogers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Jane Rogers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Jane Rogers. The network helps show where H. Jane Rogers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Jane Rogers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Jane Rogers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Jane Rogers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Jane Rogers. H. Jane Rogers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 10
2 10
3 26
4 32
5 1
6 15
7 70
8 4
9 226
10 41
11
Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression Proceduresbreakdown →
824
12 9
13 92
14 7
15 2
16
Detecting Biased Test Items: Comparison of the IRT Area and Mantel-Haenszel Methods.
3
17 20
18
Promising Directions for Assessing Item Response Model Fit to Test Data.
5
19 5
20 13

About H. Jane Rogers

H. Jane Rogers is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Computer Networks and Communications and Applied Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (12 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (8 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (871 citations), Statistics and Probability (262 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (278 citations). H. Jane Rogers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Hariharan Swaminathan, Ronald K. Hambleton, John Hattie, Russell Jones, Devin M. Kearns, Taylor A. Koriakin, Jill L. Adelson, D. Betsy McCoach, Lyn Littlefield and Warren Cann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Frontiers in Psychology and Educational and Psychological Measurement.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026