Daniel D. Goering

712 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 559 citations indexed

About

Daniel D. Goering is a scholar working on Gender Studies, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel D. Goering has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 559 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Gender Studies, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Daniel D. Goering's work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). Daniel D. Goering is often cited by papers focused on Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). Daniel D. Goering collaborates with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Japan. Daniel D. Goering's co-authors include Ernest H. O’Boyle, Sheryl L. Walter, Scott E. Seibert, Rong Su, Akihito Shimazu, Matthew W. Rutherford, Chao Miao, Joseph E. Coombs, Eean Crawford and Amy E. Colbert and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Management, Journal of Organizational Behavior and Journal of Business and Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel D. Goering

7 papers receiving 544 citations

Hit Papers

A Tale of Two Sample Sources: Do Results from Online Pane... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel D. Goering United States 5 209 183 130 106 102 7 559
Rachel S. Rauvola United States 11 221 1.1× 151 0.8× 122 0.9× 108 1.0× 139 1.4× 25 737
Maria Luisa Farnese Italy 15 287 1.4× 167 0.9× 216 1.7× 102 1.0× 100 1.0× 34 800
Kelly Pledger Weeks United States 7 286 1.4× 150 0.8× 160 1.2× 61 0.6× 61 0.6× 13 523
Michela Cortini Italy 16 186 0.9× 133 0.7× 159 1.2× 85 0.8× 101 1.0× 58 726
Rebecca Hewett Netherlands 11 351 1.7× 177 1.0× 153 1.2× 39 0.4× 96 0.9× 18 575
Michelle Singer Foust United States 3 291 1.4× 203 1.1× 208 1.6× 113 1.1× 53 0.5× 5 646
Danyang Du China 12 498 2.4× 274 1.5× 235 1.8× 96 0.9× 152 1.5× 23 761
Bart L. Weathington United States 13 346 1.7× 180 1.0× 243 1.9× 183 1.7× 111 1.1× 25 855
Siti Aisyah Panatik Malaysia 12 233 1.1× 159 0.9× 190 1.5× 132 1.2× 94 0.9× 92 622
Russell P. Guay United States 11 324 1.6× 170 0.9× 246 1.9× 111 1.0× 36 0.4× 18 665

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel D. Goering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel D. Goering's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel D. Goering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel D. Goering more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel D. Goering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel D. Goering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel D. Goering. The network helps show where Daniel D. Goering may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel D. Goering

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel D. Goering. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel D. Goering based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel D. Goering. Daniel D. Goering is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Goering, Daniel D., et al.. (2024). We Are (Not) on the Same Team: Understanding Asian Americans’ Unique Navigation of Workplace Discrimination. Journal of Management. 52(2). 729–766. 1 indexed citations
2.
Goering, Daniel D., et al.. (2021). Understanding the career and job outcomes of contemporary career attitudes within the context of career environments: An integrative meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 43(2). 286–309. 41 indexed citations
3.
Walter, Sheryl L., Scott E. Seibert, Daniel D. Goering, & Ernest H. O’Boyle. (2018). A Tale of Two Sample Sources: Do Results from Online Panel Data and Conventional Data Converge?. Journal of Business and Psychology. 34(4). 425–452. 429 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Goering, Daniel D., et al.. (2017). Not if, but how they differ: A meta-analytic test of the nomological networks of burnout and engagement. BearWorks (Missouri State University). 5. 21–34. 46 indexed citations
5.
Rutherford, Matthew W., Ernest H. O’Boyle, Chao Miao, Daniel D. Goering, & Joseph E. Coombs. (2017). Do response rates matter in entrepreneurship research?. Journal of Business Venturing Insights. 8. 93–98. 26 indexed citations
6.
Goering, Daniel D., et al.. (2016). The Value of Vulnerability: A Social Learning Perspective on Leader Humility. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2016(1). 14334–14334. 2 indexed citations
7.
Walter, Sheryl L., Scott E. Seibert, Daniel D. Goering, & Ernest H. O’Boyle. (2016). An Examination of the Convergence of Online Panel Data and Conventionally Sourced Data. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2016(1). 11498–11498. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026