Dane K. Peterson

2.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
38 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Dane K. Peterson is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Dane K. Peterson has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Information Systems and Management, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 9 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Dane K. Peterson's work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (11 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (9 papers) and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (9 papers). Dane K. Peterson is often cited by papers focused on Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (11 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (9 papers) and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (9 papers). Dane K. Peterson collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Macao. Dane K. Peterson's co-authors include Gordon F. Pitz, Bobby C. Vaught, David Meinert, Martin D. Crossland, Tian Qing, Chung S. Kim, Chung-Hwan Kim, James H. McHose and Joong H. Kim and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Business Ethics and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Dane K. Peterson

38 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment

2004 599 citations Dane K. Peterson Business & Society profile →

Peers

Dane K. Peterson

OBHRM

SM

ISM

SPS

MARKE

John Cunningham Canada

Thomas N. Ingram United States

Rafik I. Beekun United States

LaRue Tone Hosmer United States

Robert S. Billings United States

Raymond W. LaForge United States

Goutam Challagalla United States

W. Harvey Hegarty United States

Rajan Nataraajan United States

K. Sivakumar United States

John Cunningham Canada

Dane K. Peterson

882 ×1.1

OBHRM

413 ×0.6

SM

687 ×1.1

ISM

815 ×1.3

SPS

353 ×0.9

MARKE

Citations per year, relative to Dane K. Peterson Dane K. Peterson (= 1×) peers John Cunningham

Countries citing papers authored by Dane K. Peterson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dane K. Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dane K. Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dane K. Peterson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dane K. Peterson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dane K. Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dane K. Peterson. The network helps show where Dane K. Peterson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dane K. Peterson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dane K. Peterson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dane K. Peterson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dane K. Peterson. Dane K. Peterson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Peterson, Dane K.. (2018). Enhancing corporate reputation through corporate philanthropy. Journal of strategy and management. 11(1). 18–32. 24 indexed citations

2.

Peterson, Dane K., et al.. (2015). Relationship Between Corporate Foundation Giving and the Economic Cycle for Consumer- and Industrial-Oriented Firms. Business & Society. 56(8). 1169–1194. 10 indexed citations

3.

Peterson, Dane K., et al.. (2011). Employee volunteerism: an exploratory study of recruiting volunteers in the workplace. International Journal of Business Environment. 4(2). 146–146. 2 indexed citations

4.

Peterson, Dane K., et al.. (2007). Consumer trust: privacy policies and third‐party seals. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 14(4). 654–669. 26 indexed citations

5.

Meinert, David, et al.. (2006). Would Regulation of Web Site Privacy Policy Statements Increase Consumer Trust?. Informing Science and IT Education Conference. 8 indexed citations

6.

Peterson, Dane K.. (2004). The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment. Business & Society. 43(3). 296–319. 599 indexed citations breakdown →

7.

Peterson, Dane K.. (2004). Benefits of participation in corporate volunteer programs: employees' perceptions. Personnel Review. 33(6). 615–627. 118 indexed citations

8.

Peterson, Dane K. & Chung-Hwan Kim. (2003). Perceptions on IS Risks and Failure Types. Journal of Global Information Management. 11(3). 19–38. 19 indexed citations

9.

Kim, Chung S. & Dane K. Peterson. (2003). A Comparison of the Perceived Importance of Information Systems Development Strategies by Developers from the United States and Korea. Information Resources Management Journal. 16(2). 1–18. 26 indexed citations

10.

Peterson, Dane K., Chung-Hwan Kim, & Joong H. Kim. (2003). Perceptions of Information Systems Objectives: A Comparison of IS Professionals from the United States and Korea. Journal of Global Information Technology Management. 6(2). 27–44. 4 indexed citations

11.

Kim, Chung S. & Dane K. Peterson. (2002). Cultural Differences in Developers' Perceptions of Information Systems Success Factors. Journal of Global Information Management. 10(2). 5–13. 10 indexed citations

12.

Peterson, Dane K.. (2002). Deviant Workplace Behavior and the Organization's Ethical Climate. Journal of Business and Psychology. 17(1). 47–61. 252 indexed citations

13.

Kim, Chung S. & Dane K. Peterson. (2001). Developers' Perceptions of Information Systems Success Factors. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 41(2). 29–35. 10 indexed citations

14.

Peterson, Dane K., et al.. (2001). Belief in Universal Ethics. Business and Professional Ethics Journal. 20(2). 47–62. 12 indexed citations

15.

Peterson, Dane K., et al.. (2001). Ethical Beliefs of Business Professionals: A Study of Gender, Age and External Factors. Journal of Business Ethics. 31(3). 225–232. 133 indexed citations

16.

Peterson, Dane K. & Chung S. Kim. (2000). Information systems objectives: Perceptions of information systems developers of different cultures. CSUSB ScholarWorks (California State University, San Bernardino). 9(1). 1. 1 indexed citations

17.

Kim, Chung S., Dane K. Peterson, & David Meinert. (1999). Students' Perceptions on Information Systems Success. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 39(3). 68–72. 1 indexed citations

18.

Peterson, Dane K. & Gordon F. Pitz. (1988). Confidence, uncertainty, and the use of information.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 14(1). 85–92. 199 indexed citations

19.

Peterson, Dane K. & Gordon F. Pitz. (1986). Effect of input from a mechanical model on clinical judgment.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 71(1). 163–167. 25 indexed citations

20.

Peterson, Dane K. & Gordon F. Pitz. (1985). Explicit cue weighting in a prediction task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 36(3). 289–304. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact