Lisa Elfring

889 total citations
21 papers, 721 citations indexed

About

Lisa Elfring is a scholar working on Education, Molecular Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Lisa Elfring has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 721 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Education, 8 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Lisa Elfring's work include Innovative Teaching Methods (9 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (6 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (4 papers). Lisa Elfring is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching Methods (9 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (6 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (4 papers). Lisa Elfring collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Lisa Elfring's co-authors include John W. Tamkun, Renate Deuring, Claire M. McCallum, Craig L. Peterson, James A. Kennison, Terry L. Orr‐Weaver, J. William O. Ballard, Brenda J. Brizuela, Angela H. DePace and Ophelia Papoulas and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Molecular and Cellular Biology and Development.

In The Last Decade

Lisa Elfring

18 papers receiving 700 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lisa Elfring United States 10 590 96 85 82 77 21 721
Melanie L. Styers United States 13 456 0.8× 26 0.3× 90 1.1× 67 0.8× 17 0.2× 19 838
Shyam Ramchandani Canada 8 1.0k 1.8× 49 0.5× 15 0.2× 267 3.3× 30 0.4× 9 1.1k
Catherine Kirkpatrick United States 11 661 1.1× 32 0.3× 18 0.2× 71 0.9× 31 0.4× 21 815
Heather McQueen United Kingdom 12 391 0.7× 195 2.0× 131 1.5× 482 5.9× 20 0.3× 20 851
Janet G. Graham United States 6 131 0.2× 24 0.3× 65 0.8× 129 1.6× 12 0.2× 9 377
Pavan Kadandale United States 14 217 0.4× 40 0.4× 90 1.1× 56 0.7× 3 0.0× 24 538
Hélène Hagège France 8 591 1.0× 96 1.0× 20 0.2× 162 2.0× 20 0.3× 23 758
Elizabeth A. Vallen United States 14 845 1.4× 105 1.1× 12 0.1× 130 1.6× 15 0.2× 18 1.0k
Kristian Jeppsson Sweden 9 496 0.8× 107 1.1× 6 0.1× 143 1.7× 8 0.1× 10 586
Philip J. MacKinnon Australia 8 286 0.5× 139 1.4× 46 0.5× 104 1.3× 3 0.0× 10 486

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Elfring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Elfring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Elfring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Elfring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Elfring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Elfring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Elfring. The network helps show where Lisa Elfring may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Elfring

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Elfring. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Elfring based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Elfring. Lisa Elfring is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rezende, Lisa F., et al.. (2024). Impact of an instructional team's feedback on an instructor's teaching practices in a Biology of Cancer course. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 52(6). 621–632.
2.
Kim, Young Ae, et al.. (2022). Using an Instructional Team During Pandemic Remote Teaching Enhanced Student Outcomes in a Large STEM Course. Journal of College Science Teaching. 51(3). 12–21. 1 indexed citations
3.
Kim, Young Ae, et al.. (2021). A close look at change: the role of an instructional-team community on an Instructor’s evolution during instructional reform. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 3 indexed citations
4.
Kim, Young Ae, et al.. (2021). Responsive Teaching in Online Learning Environments: Using an Instructional Team to Promote Formative Assessment and Sense of Community. Journal of College Science Teaching. 50(4). 17–24. 10 indexed citations
6.
Buxner, Sanlyn, et al.. (2021). Undergraduate Student Conceptions of DNA and Their Understanding of Basic Science. Journal of College Science Teaching. 50(5). 47–56.
7.
Cox, Jonathan A. G., et al.. (2020). Exploring Undergraduate Students’ Abilities to Collect and Interpret Formative Assessment Data. Journal of Chemical Education. 97(12). 4245–4254. 6 indexed citations
8.
Kim, Young Ae, et al.. (2019). Learning Researchers: Promoting Formative Assessment in STEM Courses. Journal of College Science Teaching. 48(5). 36–41. 8 indexed citations
9.
Elfring, Lisa, et al.. (2018). Authentic Inquiry through Modeling in Biology (AIM-Bio): An Introductory Laboratory Curriculum That Increases Undergraduates’ Scientific Agency and Skills. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 17(4). ar63–ar63. 41 indexed citations
10.
Elfring, Lisa. (2016). Helping Teachers in the Evolution-Teaching Dilemma: Understanding Evolution by Kostas Kampourakis. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 15(4). fe10–fe10.
11.
Burd, Gail D., Debra Tomanek, Paul Blowers, et al.. (2015). Developing faculty cultures for evidence-based teaching practices in STEM: A progress report. 90–102. 2 indexed citations
12.
Offerdahl, Erika G., et al.. (2008). Reading Questions in Large-Lecture Courses: Limitations and Unexpected Outcomes.. The journal of college science teaching. 37(4). 43–47. 2 indexed citations
13.
Baldwin, Thomas, Lisa Elfring, & Erika G. Offerdahl. (2008). Ph.D. in biochemistry (education)!. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 36(4). 251–252. 1 indexed citations
14.
Lee, Laura A., Lisa Elfring, Giovanni Bosco, & Terry L. Orr‐Weaver. (2001). A Genetic Screen for Suppressors and Enhancers of the Drosophila PAN GU Cell Cycle Kinase Identifies Cyclin B as a Target. Genetics. 158(4). 1545–1556. 41 indexed citations
15.
Kashevsky, Helena, et al.. (2000). PAN GU: a protein kinase that inhibits S phase and promotes mitosis in early Drosophila development. Development. 127(22). 4763–4774. 50 indexed citations
16.
Elfring, Lisa, Ophelia Papoulas, Renate Deuring, et al.. (1998). Genetic Analysis of brahma: The Drosophila Homolog of the Yeast Chromatin Remodeling Factor SWI2/SNF2. Genetics. 148(1). 251–265. 162 indexed citations
17.
Elfring, Lisa, et al.. (1997). Drosophila PLUTONIUM protein is a specialized cell cycle regulator required at the onset of embryogenesis.. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 8(4). 583–593. 37 indexed citations
18.
Brizuela, Brenda J., Lisa Elfring, J. William O. Ballard, John W. Tamkun, & James A. Kennison. (1994). Genetic analysis of the brahma gene of Drosophila melanogaster and polytene chromosome subdivisions 72AB.. Genetics. 137(3). 803–813. 104 indexed citations
19.
Elfring, Lisa, Renate Deuring, Claire M. McCallum, Craig L. Peterson, & John W. Tamkun. (1994). Identification and Characterization of Drosophila Relatives of the Yeast Transcriptional Activator SNF2/SWI2. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 14(4). 2225–2234. 43 indexed citations
20.
Elfring, Lisa, Renate Deuring, Claire M. McCallum, Craig L. Peterson, & John W. Tamkun. (1994). Identification and characterization of Drosophila relatives of the yeast transcriptional activator SNF2/SWI2.. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 14(4). 2225–2234. 166 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026