Chu Kim‐Prieto
- Social Psychology top 0.2%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Applied Psychology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Co-authors
- Ed DienerShigehiro OishiDongwon ChoiWilliam TovDerrick WirtzRobert Biswas‐DienerChristie Napa ScollonIncheol Choi
- Topics
- Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers)Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPsychological ScienceJournal of Applied Social Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalySouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Chu Kim‐Prieto
19 papers receiving 4.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
- Social Psychology 2.8k
- Clinical Psychology 1.5k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
- Applied Psychology 1.1k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Chu Kim‐Prieto
This map shows the geographic impact of Chu Kim‐Prieto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chu Kim‐Prieto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chu Kim‐Prieto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chu Kim‐Prieto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chu Kim‐Prieto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chu Kim‐Prieto. The network helps show where Chu Kim‐Prieto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chu Kim‐Prieto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chu Kim‐Prieto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chu Kim‐Prieto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chu Kim‐Prieto. Chu Kim‐Prieto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 227 | |
| 7 | On 'Feeling Right' in Cultural Contexts: How Person-Culture Match Affects Self-Esteem and Subjective Well-Being | 26 |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelingsbreakdown → | 3163 |
| 10 | 75 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 85 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 76 | |
| 15 | 266 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 211 | |
| 18 | Experience Sampling: Promises and Pitfalls, Strengths and Weaknessesbreakdown → | 568 |
| 19 | 9 |
About Chu Kim‐Prieto
Chu Kim‐Prieto is a scholar working on General Psychology, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.1k citations), Social Psychology (2.8k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations). Chu Kim‐Prieto has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Ed Diener, Shigehiro Oishi, Dongwon Choi, William Tov, Derrick Wirtz, Robert Biswas‐Diener, Christie Napa Scollon, Incheol Choi, Maya Tamir and Hyekyung Park. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Science and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.