Michael Eid
- Social Psychology top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.2%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Applied Psychology top 0.2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Co-authors
- Ed DienerMaike LuhmannTanja LischetzkeChristian GeiserRolf SteyerManfred SchmittRichard E. LucasWilhelm Hofmann
- Topics
- Mental Health Research Topics (52 papers)Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (36 papers)Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (27 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Michael Eid
202 papers receiving 9.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
- Social Psychology 3.8k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.3k
- Clinical Psychology 2.7k
- Applied Psychology 1.5k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Eid
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Eid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Eid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Eid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Eid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Eid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Eid. The network helps show where Michael Eid may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Eid
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Eid. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Eid based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Eid. Michael Eid is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 50 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 267 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 51 | |
| 20 | Situational effects in psychological assessments of traits: The FPI, NEO-FFI, and EPI questionnaires | 2 |
About Michael Eid
Michael Eid is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 211 papers that have together received 9.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (52 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (36 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.5k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.3k citations) and Social Psychology (3.8k citations). Michael Eid has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ed Diener, Maike Luhmann, Tanja Lischetzke, Ed Diener, Christian Geiser, Rolf Steyer, Manfred Schmitt, Richard E. Lucas, Wilhelm Hofmann and Tobias Koch. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Bulletin and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.