Christine Dearnley
- Education top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Information Systems top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- J.G.B. HaighChristine RhodesPeter RobertsPamela Williams-PiehotaJanet HargreavesElizabeth WalkerFelicity AstinJ. Garside
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers)Reflective Practices in Education (9 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIreland
In The Last Decade
Christine Dearnley
29 papers receiving 584 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Education 270
- General Health Professions 146
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 126
- Information Systems 95
- Sociology and Political Science 84
Countries citing papers authored by Christine Dearnley
This map shows the geographic impact of Christine Dearnley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christine Dearnley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christine Dearnley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christine Dearnley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christine Dearnley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christine Dearnley. The network helps show where Christine Dearnley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christine Dearnley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christine Dearnley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christine Dearnley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christine Dearnley. Christine Dearnley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 73 | |
| 4 | Innovation in Teaching and Learningin Health Higher Education | 3 |
| 5 | Innovation in teaching and learning in health higher education - literature review. | 3 |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | The impact of an enhanced assessment tool on students' experience of being assessed in clinical practice: a focus group study | 4 |
| 12 | 55 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 184 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | Achieving lifelong learning in nursing. | 4 |
| 20 | 9 |
About Christine Dearnley
Christine Dearnley is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Education and General Dentistry, having authored 31 papers that have together received 645 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (10 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (9 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (41 citations), Leadership and Management (15 citations) and Education (270 citations). Christine Dearnley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include J.G.B. Haigh, Christine Rhodes, Peter Roberts, Pamela Williams-Piehota, Janet Hargreaves, Elizabeth Walker, Felicity Astin, J. Garside, Mary J. Morrell and John Stephenson. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, Nurse Education Today and Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.