Ann Ooms
- Education top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 2%
- Research and Theory top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Di Marks‐MaranJoan GarfieldRobert C. delMasLinda BurkeBeth ChanceJoan E. HughesMichael C. RodriguezHelen Foster
- Topics
- Nursing education and management (9 papers)Online and Blended Learning (7 papers)Statistics Education and Methodologies (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCyprus
In The Last Decade
Ann Ooms
51 papers receiving 862 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Education 413
- General Health Professions 198
- Statistics and Probability 182
- Research and Theory 166
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 155
Countries citing papers authored by Ann Ooms
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Ooms's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Ooms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Ooms more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Ooms
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Ooms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Ooms. The network helps show where Ann Ooms may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann Ooms
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann Ooms. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann Ooms based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann Ooms. Ann Ooms is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | Catching them early: Identifying potential early-career leavers | 0 |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | Learning styles and Locus of control in undergraduate medical, nursing and physiotherapy students: a comparative study | 3 |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 51 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | Students' Perceptions of Online-Learning Quality Given Comfort, Motivation, Satisfaction, and Experience. | 67 |
| 20 | Perceptions of Online Learning Quality Given Comfort with Technology, Motivation to Learn Technology Skills, Satisfaction, and Online Learning Experience | 11 |
About Ann Ooms
Ann Ooms is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Education, having authored 62 papers that have together received 954 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (9 papers), Online and Blended Learning (7 papers) and Statistics Education and Methodologies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (166 citations), Statistics and Probability (182 citations) and Leadership and Management (23 citations). Ann Ooms has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Cyprus. Frequent co-authors include Di Marks‐Maran, Joan Garfield, Robert C. delMas, Linda Burke, Beth Chance, Joan E. Hughes, Michael C. Rodriguez, Helen Foster, Deborah Anderson and Vladlena Benson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Public Health Nutrition and International Journal of Nursing Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.