Chris Carter

31 papers receiving 196 citations

Peers

Chris Carter
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Social Psychology 66
  • Sociology and Political Science 25
  • Human-Computer Interaction 25
  • Clinical Psychology 24
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 24
Replace Bert Slof with:
Bert Slof Netherlands
Matthew T. McMahon United States
Chauncey Wilson United States
Nehemiah Jordan United States
Suzanne Jones United States
Françoise Decortis Belgium
Jamie Sherman United States
Jochen Nelles Germany
Elaine Perignat United States
Adam K. Dubé Canada
Chris Carter relative to Bert Slof Netherlands Bert Slof's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bert Slof · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Carter. The network helps show where Chris Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chris Carter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chris Carter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chris Carter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chris Carter. Chris Carter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 3
3 0
4 40
5 11
6
QUT: learn virtual production in our animation courses
1
7
Adopting virtual production for animated filmmaking
3
8 3
9
Cultures of Strategy: Remaking the BBC, 1985-2003
1
10
An Analysis of the Character Animation in Disney’s Tangled
3
11
Frames of Anime: Culture and Image-Building
1
12 5
13
"Heads I Lose, Tails You Win", Or, How Richard Wiseman Nullifies Positive Results, and What to Do about It: A Response to Wiseman's (2010) Critique of Parapsychology
1
14
Science and the Near-Death Experience: How Consciousness Survives Death
9
15
Extraordinary Knowing: Science, Skepticism, and the Inexplicable Powers of the Human Mind
33
16 4
17 1
18 21
19 23
20
The X-Files : Fight the Future
1

About Chris Carter

Chris Carter is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Occupational Therapy and Social Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 239 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (6 papers), Human Motion and Animation (6 papers) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (7 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (25 citations) and Social Psychology (66 citations). Chris Carter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Graham, Tarek M. Hassan, Abigail Powell, Andrew Dainty, Martin Hanneghan, Stephen Tang, Paul Fergus, Alan Finnegan, Mark Shelbourn and Andrew Baldwin. Their work appears in journals such as Construction Management and Economics, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing and Social enterprise journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026