Jamie Sherman
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Safety Research top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Co-authors
- Dawn NafusRobert B. MillerJ. HicksMark ClaypoolShengmei LiuKen AndersonArthur KleinmanKelly Bergstrom
- Topics
- Digital Games and Media (6 papers)Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers)Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers)
- Journals
- Big Data & SocietyInternational journal of communicationProceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Jamie Sherman
12 papers receiving 311 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Sociology and Political Science 116
- Human-Computer Interaction 94
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 46
- Safety Research 45
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 35
Countries citing papers authored by Jamie Sherman
This map shows the geographic impact of Jamie Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jamie Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jamie Sherman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jamie Sherman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jamie Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jamie Sherman. The network helps show where Jamie Sherman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jamie Sherman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jamie Sherman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jamie Sherman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jamie Sherman. Jamie Sherman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | Big Data, Big Questions| This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice | 48 |
| 12 | This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice | 125 |
| 13 | 49 |
About Jamie Sherman
Jamie Sherman is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Developmental and Educational Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (6 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers) and Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (94 citations), Safety Research (45 citations) and Applied Psychology (24 citations). Jamie Sherman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Dawn Nafus, Robert B. Miller, J. Hicks, Mark Claypool, Shengmei Liu, Ken Anderson, Arthur Kleinman and Kelly Bergstrom. Their work appears in journals such as Big Data & Society, International journal of communication and Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.