Jamie Sherman

698 total citations
13 papers, 339 citations indexed

About

Jamie Sherman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jamie Sherman has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 339 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jamie Sherman's work include Digital Games and Media (6 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers) and Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers). Jamie Sherman is often cited by papers focused on Digital Games and Media (6 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers) and Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers). Jamie Sherman collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Jamie Sherman's co-authors include Dawn Nafus, Shengmei Liu, Robert B. Miller, J. Hicks, Mark Claypool, Kelly Bergstrom, Arthur Kleinman and Ken Anderson and has published in prestigious journals such as Big Data & Society, International journal of communication and Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings.

In The Last Decade

Jamie Sherman

12 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jamie Sherman United States 6 116 94 46 45 35 13 339
Shaimaa Lazem Egypt 11 86 0.7× 198 2.1× 19 0.4× 11 0.2× 24 0.7× 59 396
Ana Caraban Portugal 7 102 0.9× 113 1.2× 16 0.3× 25 0.6× 29 0.8× 12 313
Salvador Otón Spain 12 62 0.5× 46 0.5× 12 0.3× 14 0.3× 26 0.7× 64 505
Sanchari Das United States 12 172 1.5× 59 0.6× 13 0.3× 21 0.5× 34 1.0× 99 507
Aditya Vishwanath United States 8 80 0.7× 157 1.7× 14 0.3× 21 0.5× 11 0.3× 13 350
Rebecca Gulotta United States 11 98 0.8× 265 2.8× 17 0.4× 13 0.3× 32 0.9× 14 475
Christian Sturm Germany 7 79 0.7× 141 1.5× 12 0.3× 16 0.4× 23 0.7× 20 284
Kaiton Williams United States 6 254 2.2× 281 3.0× 31 0.7× 17 0.4× 28 0.8× 6 551
Hanna Schneider Germany 7 53 0.5× 107 1.1× 8 0.2× 63 1.4× 29 0.8× 12 317
Catherine Grevet United States 11 134 1.2× 189 2.0× 48 1.0× 7 0.2× 29 0.8× 14 439

Countries citing papers authored by Jamie Sherman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jamie Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jamie Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jamie Sherman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jamie Sherman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jamie Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jamie Sherman. The network helps show where Jamie Sherman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jamie Sherman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jamie Sherman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jamie Sherman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jamie Sherman. Jamie Sherman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Liu, Shengmei, et al.. (2021). The Effects of Network Latency on Competitive First-Person Shooter Game Players. 151–156. 15 indexed citations
2.
3.
Sherman, Jamie, et al.. (2021). Little Dramas Everywhere: Using Ethnography to Anticipate the Future. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings. 2021(1). 7–14. 2 indexed citations
4.
Bergstrom, Kelly & Jamie Sherman. (2021). Who Stays in the Game? Similarities and Differences Between Current and Former Digital Games Players. Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2 indexed citations
5.
Liu, Shengmei, et al.. (2021). L33t or N00b?. 1–6. 5 indexed citations
6.
Sherman, Jamie, et al.. (2020). Toxicity v. toxicity: How Ethnography Can Inform Scalable Technical Solutions. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings. 2020(1). 279–297. 2 indexed citations
7.
Liu, Shengmei, et al.. (2020). 'Git Gud!' -- Evaluation of Self-Rated Player Skill Compared to Actual Player Performance. 306–310. 5 indexed citations
8.
Nafus, Dawn, et al.. (2018). Algorithms as fetish: Faith and possibility in algorithmic work. Big Data & Society. 5(1). 45 indexed citations
9.
Anderson, Ken, et al.. (2017). Creating a Creators’ Market: How Ethnography Gave Intel a New Perspective On Digital Content Creators. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings. 2017(1). 425–443. 5 indexed citations
10.
Sherman, Jamie, et al.. (2016). Anthropological Theory for Ethnography in Business. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings. 2016(1). 555–559.
11.
Nafus, Dawn & Jamie Sherman. (2014). Big Data, Big Questions| This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. International journal of communication. 8. 11. 48 indexed citations
12.
Nafus, Dawn & Jamie Sherman. (2014). This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. 125 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026