Social enterprise journal

410 papers and 7.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 410 papers published in Social enterprise journal in the last decades have received a total of 7.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Social enterprise journal usually cover Management of Technology and Innovation (257 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (159 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (125 papers) specifically the topics of Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (240 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (139 papers) and Community Development and Social Impact (116 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social enterprise journal are Helen Haugh, Jacques Defourny, Marthe Nyssens, Kai Hockerts, Mike Bull, Carlo Borzaga, Giulia Galera, Fergus Lyon, Briga Hynes and John L. Thompson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social enterprise journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social enterprise journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social enterprise journal.

Countries where authors publish in Social enterprise journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social enterprise journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social enterprise journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social enterprise journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025