Cheryl R. Kaiser
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.2%
- Gender Studies top 0.1%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 2%
- Co-authors
- Carol T. MillerBrenda MajorTessa L. DoverClara L. WilkinsShannon K. McCoyBenjamin J. DruryLaurie T. O’BrienJennifer S. Pratt-Hyatt
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (55 papers)Gender Diversity and Inequality (24 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (23 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomPortugal
In The Last Decade
Cheryl R. Kaiser
71 papers receiving 4.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Sociology and Political Science 3.0k
- Gender Studies 1.7k
- Social Psychology 1.6k
- Clinical Psychology 459
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 405
Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl R. Kaiser
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl R. Kaiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl R. Kaiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl R. Kaiser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl R. Kaiser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl R. Kaiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl R. Kaiser. The network helps show where Cheryl R. Kaiser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl R. Kaiser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl R. Kaiser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl R. Kaiser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl R. Kaiser. Cheryl R. Kaiser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 45 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 139 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 61 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 264 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 132 | |
| 18 | 234 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Cheryl R. Kaiser
Cheryl R. Kaiser is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 73 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (55 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (24 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (1.7k citations), Social Psychology (1.6k citations) and Sociology and Political Science (3.0k citations). Cheryl R. Kaiser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Carol T. Miller, Brenda Major, Tessa L. Dover, Clara L. Wilkins, Shannon K. McCoy, Benjamin J. Drury, Laurie T. O’Brien, Jennifer S. Pratt-Hyatt, S. Brooke Vick and Laura Brady. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Journal of Applied Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.