Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

24.5k citations
833 papers · indexed · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Counseling Practices and Supervision
    • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

Papers in

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

704 papers receiving 19.0k citations

Peers

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
Comparison fields: 5 of 213
  • Social Psychology 8.6k
  • Clinical Psychology 8.7k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 4.2k
  • Applied Psychology 1.5k
  • Safety Research 2.1k
Replace The Spanish Journal of Psychology with:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology Spain
Social Psychology of Education United States
Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne Canada
European Psychologist Germany
European Journal of Psychological Assessment Germany
Self and Identity United States
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences United States
Journal of Black Psychology United States
School Psychology International United States
Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology United States
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development relative to The Spanish Journal of Psychology Spain The Spanish Journal of Psychology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
The Spanish Journal of Psychology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development.

About Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

The 833 papers published in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development in the last decades have received a total of 24.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development usually cover Social Psychology (317 papers), Applied Psychology (69 papers), Clinical Psychology (282 papers), Safety Research (86 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (123 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (144 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (130 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (61 papers), Career Development and Diversity (57 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (49 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (47 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (45 papers) and Psychological Testing and Assessment (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development are Bert W. Westbrook, Dimiter M. Dimitrov, Robin K. Henson, Peter F. Merenda, Bruce Thompson, Christine Robitschek, Colin Ayre, Andy Scally, Kenneth G. Rice and Robert B. Slaney.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026