Natasha Mitchell

139 total papers · 1.9k total citations
68 papers, 857 citations indexed

About

Natasha Mitchell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natasha Mitchell has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 857 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Education and 9 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Natasha Mitchell's work include Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers). Natasha Mitchell is often cited by papers focused on Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers). Natasha Mitchell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Natasha Mitchell's co-authors include Rebecca Randell, Dawn Dowding, Carl Thompson, David Torgerson, Catherine Hewitt, Julia Bryan, Nicky Cullum, Rebecca Foster, Valerie Lattimer and Arabella Scantlebury and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and Journal of Affective Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Natasha Mitchell

55 papers receiving 785 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Natasha Mitchell	223	145	145	120	111	68	857
Patricia M. Schwirian	363 1.6×	116 0.8×	297 2.0×	76 0.6×	52 0.5×	38	962
Suzanne Denieffe	194 0.9×	97 0.7×	81 0.6×	69 0.6×	64 0.6×	43	726
Noreen Frisch	331 1.5×	108 0.7×	140 1.0×	49 0.4×	73 0.7×	48	747
Nurten Kaya	222 1.0×	134 0.9×	96 0.7×	112 0.9×	37 0.3×	79	785
Donald D. Kautz	257 1.2×	178 1.2×	209 1.4×	84 0.7×	27 0.2×	73	968
Arja Isola	424 1.9×	216 1.5×	211 1.5×	137 1.1×	55 0.5×	52	960
Stephen J. Cavanagh	427 1.9×	89 0.6×	100 0.7×	83 0.7×	82 0.7×	41	1.0k
Kia Gluschkoff	301 1.3×	217 1.5×	107 0.7×	189 1.6×	67 0.6×	60	830
Beate André	366 1.6×	144 1.0×	208 1.4×	45 0.4×	47 0.4×	51	764
Beverly Henry	292 1.3×	147 1.0×	339 2.3×	44 0.4×	38 0.3×	60	826

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Mitchell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Mitchell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Mitchell. The network helps show where Natasha Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Mitchell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Mitchell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Mitchell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Mitchell. Natasha Mitchell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact