Natasha Mitchell

1.9k total citations
69 papers, 859 citations indexed

About

Natasha Mitchell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natasha Mitchell has authored 69 papers receiving a total of 859 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Education and 9 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Natasha Mitchell's work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (4 papers). Natasha Mitchell is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (4 papers). Natasha Mitchell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Natasha Mitchell's co-authors include Dawn Dowding, Carl Thompson, Rebecca Randell, David Torgerson, Catherine Hewitt, Julia Bryan, Nicky Cullum, Rebecca Foster, Valerie Lattimer and Cheryl Holcomb‐McCoy and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and Journal of Affective Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Natasha Mitchell

55 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Natasha Mitchell United Kingdom	17	223	145	145	120	110	69	859
Nurten Kaya Türkiye	15	221 1.0×	135 0.9×	99 0.7×	112 0.9×	38 0.3×	79	792
Heli Hätönen Finland	20	462 2.1×	312 2.2×	170 1.2×	179 1.5×	52 0.5×	41	1.1k
Loreto Lancia Italy	19	503 2.3×	197 1.4×	277 1.9×	100 0.8×	33 0.3×	93	1.3k
Cristina Petrucci Italy	16	389 1.7×	157 1.1×	242 1.7×	91 0.8×	23 0.2×	56	1.0k
George Castledine United Kingdom	14	563 2.5×	112 0.8×	160 1.1×	85 0.7×	51 0.5×	289	1.2k
Nabeel Al‐Yateem United Arab Emirates	19	341 1.5×	308 2.1×	266 1.8×	187 1.6×	26 0.2×	139	1.1k
Margaret Landers Ireland	17	304 1.4×	77 0.5×	150 1.0×	90 0.8×	16 0.1×	43	888
Lambrini Kourkouta Greece	11	283 1.3×	121 0.8×	194 1.3×	68 0.6×	16 0.1×	56	940
Carol Haigh United Kingdom	20	357 1.6×	219 1.5×	249 1.7×	62 0.5×	23 0.2×	73	1.2k
Vera Nincic Canada	16	318 1.4×	137 0.9×	104 0.7×	43 0.4×	27 0.2×	30	1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Mitchell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Mitchell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Mitchell. The network helps show where Natasha Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Mitchell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Mitchell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Mitchell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Mitchell. Natasha Mitchell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Mitchell, Natasha, et al.. (2025). Family reference DNA database for identifying missing Australian service members: policy, ethical, and social implications. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 58(2). 214–225.

Ngaage, Dumbor L., Natasha Mitchell, Alex Mitchell, et al.. (2023). A randomised controlled, feasibility study to establish the acceptability of early outpatient review and early cardiac rehabilitation compared to standard practice after cardiac surgery and viability of a future large-scale trial (FARSTER). Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 9(1). 79–79. 1 indexed citations

Vanicek, Natalie, Elizabeth Coleman, Judith Watson, et al.. (2021). STEPFORWARD study: a randomised controlled feasibility trial of a self-aligning prosthetic ankle-foot for older patients with vascular-related amputations. BMJ Open. 11(3). e045195–e045195. 1 indexed citations

Hughes, Elizabeth, Natasha Mitchell, Samantha Gascoyne, et al.. (2019). Sexual health promotion in people with severe mental illness: the RESPECT feasibility RCT. Health Technology Assessment. 23(65). 1–136. 15 indexed citations

Abarno, Damien, et al.. (2019). A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science. Science & Justice. 59(5). 533–543. 14 indexed citations

Mitchell, Natasha, Elizabeth Coleman, Judith Watson, et al.. (2019). Self-aligning prosthetic device for older patients with vascular-related amputations: protocol for a randomised feasibility study (the STEPFORWARD study). BMJ Open. 9(9). e032924–e032924. 2 indexed citations

Mitchell, Natasha, Hannah Ainsworth, Hannah Buckley, et al.. (2016). Pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of contextualised grammar teaching and small group teaching to improve the writing skills of 11 year old children. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York).

Bell, Kerry, Laura Clark, Caroline Fairhurst, et al.. (2015). Enclosing a pen reduced time to response to questionnaire mailings. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 74. 144–150. 11 indexed citations

Overend, Karen, Helen Lewis, Della Bailey, et al.. (2014). CASPER plus (CollAborative care in Screen-Positive EldeRs with major depressive disorder): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 15(1). 217–217. 14 indexed citations

10.

Mitchell, Natasha. (2012). Surgical preparation of eyes. Companion Animal. 17(3). 26–28. 1 indexed citations

11.

Mitchell, Natasha. (2011). Ophthalmology self-assessment. Companion Animal. 16(6). 31–33.

12.

Mitchell, Natasha, et al.. (2011). A controlled trial of envelope colour for increasing response rates in older women. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 23(3). 236–240. 7 indexed citations

13.

Mitchell, Natasha. (2008). Ophthalmology: Extraocular polymyositis. Companion Animal. 13(8). 54–58. 1 indexed citations

14.

Mitchell, Natasha. (2008). Medical treatment for glaucoma in dogs. Companion Animal. 13(7). 78–82.

15.

Mitchell, Natasha. (2008). Ophthalmology: Cat claw injuries in canine and feline corneas. Companion Animal. 13(9). 59–67.

16.

Dowding, Dawn, Rebecca Foster, Val Lattimer, et al.. (2007). How do nurses use new technologies to inform decision making?. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations

17.

Mitchell, Natasha. (2006). Ophthalmology: Hyphaema in dogs. Companion Animal. 11(8). 85–89. 2 indexed citations

18.

Holcomb‐McCoy, Cheryl & Natasha Mitchell. (2005). A Descriptive Study of Urban School Counseling Programs.. Professional School Counseling. 8(3). 203. 19 indexed citations

19.

Mitchell, Natasha. (2000). Sister-Friends: A Counseling Group for Black Female Undergraduates.. Journal of College Counseling. 3(1). 27–32. 1 indexed citations

20.

Mitchell, Natasha, et al.. (1998). Older medical studentsʼ performances at McGill University. Academic Medicine. 73(1). 98–100. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact