Catherine Molho

29 papers receiving 766 citations

Peers

Catherine Molho
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Safety Research 182
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 323
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 212
  • Social Psychology 299
  • Sociology and Political Science 486
Replace Yutaka Horita with:
Yutaka Horita Japan
Simon Columbus Denmark
Michael T. Rizzo United States
Eftychia Stamkou Netherlands
Keigo Inukai Japan
Felix Warneken United States
Scott Akalis United States
Mitch Brown United States
Jeffrey L. Kirchner United States
Florian van Leeuwen Netherlands
Catherine Molho relative to Yutaka Horita Japan Yutaka Horita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Yutaka Horita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Molho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Molho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Molho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Molho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Molho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Molho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Molho. The network helps show where Catherine Molho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Molho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine Molho Line = papers co-authored together Catherine Molho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020116
2 2017115
3 2017110
4 201560
5 202059
6 202148
7 201945
8 201728
9 202027
10 202222
11 202020
12 202116
13 201616
14 201915
15 202114
16 202112
17 202412
18 202010
19 20159
20 20227

About Catherine Molho

Catherine Molho is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 34 papers that have together received 785 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (13 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (10 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers) and Psychology of Social Influence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (182 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (323 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (212 citations), Social Psychology (299 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (486 citations). Catherine Molho has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Balliet, Joshua M. Tybur, Simon Columbus, Paul A. M. Van Lange, Reinout E. de Vries, Fabiola H. Gerpott, Wilhelm Hofmann, Francesca Righetti, Junhui Wu and Yoel Inbar. Their work appears in journals such as Current Opinion in Psychology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Evolution and Human Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact