Thomas V. Pollet

8.3k citations
177 papers · 5.2k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 42

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas V. Pollet

170 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Hit Papers

Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories 2015 · 366 citations
3662015202620182022100200300

Peers

Thomas V. Pollet
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.6k
  • Gender Studies 593
  • Social Psychology 982
  • Parasitology 313
  • Clinical Psychology 931
Replace Frank J. Sulloway with:
Frank J. Sulloway United States
Richard McElreath United States
Michael Gurven United States
Richard M. Lerner United States
Stephen Nowicki United States
David Mellor Australia
Angus Campbell Australia
Catherine Panter‐Brick United Kingdom
Jack L. Vevea United States
Richard B. Miller United States
Thomas V. Pollet relative to Frank J. Sulloway United States Frank J. Sulloway's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Frank J. Sulloway · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas V. Pollet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas V. Pollet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas V. Pollet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas V. Pollet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas V. Pollet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas V. Pollet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas V. Pollet. The network helps show where Thomas V. Pollet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas V. Pollet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas V. Pollet Line = papers co-authored together Thomas V. Pollet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20233
3 20230
4 20227
5 20223
6 20228
7 202219
8 20212
9 20213
10 20214
11 20213
12 20214
13 202069
14 20202
15 20200
16 20207
17 20195
18 20185
19 20171
20 201630

About Thomas V. Pollet

Thomas V. Pollet is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies, Parasitology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 177 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (64 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (22 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (12 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (12 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (11 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.6k citations), Gender Studies (593 citations), Social Psychology (982 citations), Parasitology (313 citations) and Clinical Psychology (931 citations). Thomas V. Pollet has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Nettle, Gert Stulp, Robin Dunbar, Sam G. B. Roberts, Abraham P. Buunk, Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, André Krouwel, Simon Verhulst, Toon Kuppens and Nexhmedin Morina. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Evolutionary Psychology, Frontiers in Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Body Image.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026