Evolution and Human Behavior

1.5k papers and 70.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Evolution and Human Behavior in the last decades have received a total of 70.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Evolution and Human Behavior usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (997 papers), Sociology and Political Science (724 papers) and Social Psychology (371 papers) specifically the topics of Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (962 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (519 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (240 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evolution and Human Behavior are Joseph Henrich, David A. Puts, Daniel M. T. Fessler, Ernst Fehr, Pat Barclay, Francisco Gil-White, Urs Fischbacher, Steven W. Gangestad, Randy Thornhill and David I. Perrett.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Evolution and Human Behavior

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evolution and Human Behavior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evolution and Human Behavior.

Countries where authors publish in Evolution and Human Behavior

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evolution and Human Behavior. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evolution and Human Behavior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evolution and Human Behavior more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025