Tom R. Kupfer
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Joshua M. TyburRoger Giner‐SorollaPelin GülDaniel M. T. FesslerCatherine MolhoAnnika K. KarinenDebra LiebermanReinout E. de Vries
- Topics
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers)Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (8 papers)
- Journals
- Psychological SciencePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesProceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tom R. Kupfer
19 papers receiving 360 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Cognitive Neuroscience 235
- Social Psychology 165
- Sociology and Political Science 151
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
- Clinical Psychology 33
Countries citing papers authored by Tom R. Kupfer
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom R. Kupfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom R. Kupfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom R. Kupfer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom R. Kupfer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom R. Kupfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom R. Kupfer. The network helps show where Tom R. Kupfer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom R. Kupfer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom R. Kupfer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom R. Kupfer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom R. Kupfer. Tom R. Kupfer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 52 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 38 |
About Tom R. Kupfer
Tom R. Kupfer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 370 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (235 citations), Social Psychology (165 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 citations). Tom R. Kupfer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joshua M. Tybur, Roger Giner‐Sorolla, Pelin Gül, Daniel M. T. Fessler, Catherine Molho, Annika K. Karinen, Debra Lieberman, Reinout E. de Vries, Yoel Inbar and Jan‐Willem van Prooijen. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Science, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.