Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
New Approaches to Nanofabrication: Molding, Printing, and Other Techniques
20051.6k citationsM. D. Stewart, C. Grant Willson et al.profile →
Block Copolymer Lithography
2013555 citationsChristopher M. Bates, Michael J. Maher et al.Macromoleculesprofile →
Chemical amplification in the design of dry developing resist materials
1983390 citationsHiroshi Itô, C. Grant Willsonprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by C. Grant Willson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Grant Willson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Grant Willson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Grant Willson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Grant Willson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Grant Willson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Grant Willson. The network helps show where C. Grant Willson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Grant Willson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Grant Willson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Grant Willson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C. Grant Willson. C. Grant Willson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wang, Xiaohan, Harry Chou, Tao Li, et al.. (2016). Direct observation of PMMA removal from graphene surface. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2016.2 indexed citations
Hagiwara, Yuji, Brandon Rawlings, Ryan Mesch, et al.. (2011). Photobase generator enabled pitch division: a progress report. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7972. 79720F–79720F.5 indexed citations
Bailey, Travis S., Byung Jin Choi, Matthew Colburn, et al.. (2000). Step and Flash Imprint Lithography: A Technology Review. 11(4). 54–67.1 indexed citations
Willson, C. Grant, et al.. (1995). Synthesis of Polymers Having N-Hydroxymaleimide Units by Thermolysis of N-(Isopropyloxycarbonyloxy)maleimide Polymers. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society. 16(5). 443–449.3 indexed citations
17.
Thompson, L. F., C. Grant Willson, & M. J. Bowden. (1994). Introduction to microlithography. Crystal Research and Technology. 30(4).322 indexed citations
18.
Wallraff, Gregory M., Robert D. Allen, William D. Hinsberg, et al.. (1992). A chemically amplified photoresist for visible laser direct imaging. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology. 36(5). 468–476.8 indexed citations
19.
Itô, Hiroshi, et al.. (1982). New UV Resists with Negative or Positive Tone. Symposium on VLSI Technology. 86–87.27 indexed citations
20.
Jain, Kanti, C. Grant Willson, & Burn J. Lin. (1982). Fine-Line High-Speed Excimer Laser Lithography. Symposium on VLSI Technology. 92–93.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.