Brian S. Connelly

35 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integr...20102026201520202010200400600

Peers

Brian S. Connelly
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Clinical Psychology 985
  • Social Psychology 642
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 513
  • Sociology and Political Science 481
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 350
Replace Willem Hofstee with:
Willem Hofstee Netherlands
Ioannis Tsaousis Greece
Romin W. Tafarodi Canada
Kenneth D. Locke United States
Ryne A. Sherman United States
Therese Hoff Macan United States
Lauren Simon United States
Joshua S. Bourdage Canada
Jan Crusius Germany
Larissa K. Barber United States
Brian S. Connelly relative to Willem Hofstee Netherlands Willem Hofstee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Willem Hofstee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian S. Connelly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian S. Connelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian S. Connelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian S. Connelly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian S. Connelly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian S. Connelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian S. Connelly. The network helps show where Brian S. Connelly may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian S. Connelly

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian S. Connelly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian S. Connelly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brian S. Connelly. Brian S. Connelly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 0
4 1
5 2
6 31
7 33
8 97
9 48
10 68
11 68
12 42
13 158
14 26
15 117
16
An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity.breakdown →
678
17 5
18 164
19 91
20
The prevalence of depression in a high school population.
24

About Brian S. Connelly

Brian S. Connelly is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Traits and Psychology (19 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers) and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (244 citations), Clinical Psychology (985 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (513 citations). Brian S. Connelly has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Deniz S. Öneş, Paul R. Sackett, Samuel T. McAbee, Matthew J. Borneman, Nathan R. Kuncel, David M. Klieger, Jill E. Ellingson, Ute R. Hülsheger, Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko and Frederick L. Oswald. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Bulletin and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026