Brenda Keogh
- Education top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Speech and Hearing top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Topics
- Science Education and Pedagogy (6 papers)Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers)Digital Storytelling and Education (4 papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Science EducationPublic Understanding of ScienceJournal of Science Teacher Education
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
Brenda Keogh
16 papers receiving 477 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Education 495
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 190
- Philosophy 102
- Speech and Hearing 93
- Sociology and Political Science 52
Countries citing papers authored by Brenda Keogh
This map shows the geographic impact of Brenda Keogh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brenda Keogh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brenda Keogh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brenda Keogh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brenda Keogh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brenda Keogh. The network helps show where Brenda Keogh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brenda Keogh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brenda Keogh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brenda Keogh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brenda Keogh. Brenda Keogh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Talking and thinking using concept cartoons: What have we learnt? | 3 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Concept Cartoons: What Have We Learnt? * | 42 |
| 7 | It's not fair - or is it? | 1 |
| 8 | The PUPPETS Project Hits WA. | 4 |
| 9 | 49 | |
| 10 | Puppets: Bringing Stories to Life in Science. | 3 |
| 11 | Active Assessment for Science: Thinking, Learning and Assessment in Science | 10 |
| 12 | Children's Ideas, Children's Feelings. | 1 |
| 13 | Teaching and Learning in Science Using Concept Cartoons: Why Dennis Wants To Stay in at Playtime. | 30 |
| 14 | Science Goes Underground. | 9 |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 228 | |
| 17 | 99 | |
| 18 | Teaching and Learning in Science Using Concept Cartoons. | 20 |
| 19 | 66 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Brenda Keogh
Brenda Keogh is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Speech and Hearing and Education, having authored 20 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Pedagogy (6 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers) and Digital Storytelling and Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (495 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (190 citations) and Speech and Hearing (93 citations). Brenda Keogh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Stuart Naylor, Catherine Wilson, Shirley Simon, Stuart Naylor and Jane Turner. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Science Education, Public Understanding of Science and Journal of Science Teacher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.