Jane Turner
Impact in
Papers in
- Oncology 72
- Cancer survivorship and care 70
- Lymphatic System and Diseases 2
-
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 4
- Health Policy Implementation Science 2
- Co-authors
- Afaf Girgis (29 shared papers)Brian J. Kelly (19 shared papers)Phyllis Noemi Butow (26 shared papers)Nicole Marion Rankin (3 shared papers)Belinda Thewes (13 shared papers)Louise Sharpe (11 shared papers)Patsy M. Yates (21 shared papers)Sandra Christine Hayes (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Psycho-Oncology (25 papers)Supportive Care in Cancer (13 papers)BMC Cancer (6 papers)The Medical Journal of Australia (4 papers)Journal of Cancer Survivorship (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Jane Turner
127 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Oncology 2.2k
- Pharmacy 65
- General Health Professions 354
- Applied Psychology 62
- Biological Psychiatry 16
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Turner
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Turner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Turner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Turner. The network helps show where Jane Turner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Turner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 392 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 273 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 236 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 230 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 200 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 178 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 160 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 156 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 124 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 120 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 114 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 109 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 108 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 99 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 97 | |
| 16 | Fear of Cancer Recurrence: A Practical Guide for Clinicians. | 2018 | 96 |
| 17 | 2011 | 93 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 82 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 79 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 72 |
About Jane Turner
Jane Turner is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology, having authored 131 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (70 papers), Family Support in Illness (8 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (2 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (2.2k citations), Pharmacy (65 citations), General Health Professions (354 citations), Applied Psychology (62 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (16 citations). Jane Turner has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Afaf Girgis, Brian J. Kelly, Phyllis Noemi Butow, Nicole Marion Rankin, Belinda Thewes, Louise Sharpe, Patsy M. Yates, Sandra Christine Hayes, Jemma Gilchrist and Sylvie Lambert. Their work appears in journals such as Psycho-Oncology, Supportive Care in Cancer, BMC Cancer, The Medical Journal of Australia and Journal of Cancer Survivorship.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.