Bino Catasús
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Accounting top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Public Administration top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jan‐Erik GröjerThomas CarringtonFan Yang WallentinCristina ChaminádeMatti SkoogRoland AlmqvistÅge JohnsenJarmo Vakkuri
- Topics
- Accounting and Organizational Management (15 papers)Management and Organizational Studies (7 papers)Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (7 papers)
In The Last Decade
Bino Catasús
29 papers receiving 556 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Strategy and Management 260
- Accounting 237
- Management Information Systems 195
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 120
- Public Administration 67
Countries citing papers authored by Bino Catasús
This map shows the geographic impact of Bino Catasús's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bino Catasús with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bino Catasús more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bino Catasús
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bino Catasús. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bino Catasús. The network helps show where Bino Catasús may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bino Catasús
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bino Catasús. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bino Catasús based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bino Catasús. Bino Catasús is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | IFRS : Dilemman och utmaningar | 1 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Debatten om NPM behöver nyanseras | 0 |
| 5 | New Public Management har skapat rädda organisationer | 1 |
| 6 | Thinking differently: Making audit innovation the new practice standard | 2 |
| 7 | 68 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | Intellectual Capital Revisited : Paradoxes in the Knowledge Intensive Organization | 26 |
| 13 | Reinventing the university as driving force of intellectual capital | 1 |
| 14 | 73 | |
| 15 | 81 | |
| 16 | 37 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | Borders of management : five studies of accounting, organizing and the environment | 6 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Bino Catasús
Bino Catasús is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Public Administration and Accounting, having authored 33 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting and Organizational Management (15 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (7 papers) and Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (195 citations), Accounting (237 citations) and Public Administration (67 citations). Bino Catasús has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Norway and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jan‐Erik Gröjer, Thomas Carrington, Fan Yang Wallentin, Cristina Chamináde, Matti Skoog, Roland Almqvist, Åge Johnsen, Jarmo Vakkuri, Kim Klarskov Jeppesen and Marco Giuliani. Their work appears in journals such as Accounting Organizations and Society, Business Strategy and the Environment and Contemporary Accounting Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.