Jan‐Erik Gröjer

534 total citations
11 papers, 393 citations indexed

About

Jan‐Erik Gröjer is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, Jan‐Erik Gröjer has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 393 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Management Information Systems, 5 papers in Strategy and Management and 5 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Jan‐Erik Gröjer's work include Accounting and Organizational Management (7 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (4 papers) and Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (3 papers). Jan‐Erik Gröjer is often cited by papers focused on Accounting and Organizational Management (7 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (4 papers) and Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (3 papers). Jan‐Erik Gröjer collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Italy and United States. Jan‐Erik Gröjer's co-authors include Bino Catasús, Ulf Johanson, Fan Yang Wallentin, Marco Giuliani and Guy Ahonen and has published in prestigious journals such as Accounting Organizations and Society, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal and Journal of Intellectual Capital.

In The Last Decade

Jan‐Erik Gröjer

10 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jan‐Erik Gröjer Sweden 9 282 136 128 51 27 11 393
Mette Rosenkrands Johansen Denmark 8 519 1.8× 99 0.7× 153 1.2× 36 0.7× 26 1.0× 13 579
Catherine Gowthorpe United Kingdom 9 249 0.9× 172 1.3× 339 2.6× 13 0.3× 22 0.8× 20 487
Michael Habersam Austria 6 177 0.6× 132 1.0× 113 0.9× 45 0.9× 8 0.3× 9 322
Narisa Tianjing Dai China 7 153 0.5× 91 0.7× 173 1.4× 56 1.1× 18 0.7× 16 322
Antonella Silvestri Italy 8 213 0.8× 48 0.4× 124 1.0× 30 0.6× 9 0.3× 13 284
Cheng‐Jen Huang Taiwan 4 192 0.7× 24 0.2× 89 0.7× 37 0.7× 76 2.8× 18 293
David Emsley Australia 9 113 0.4× 225 1.7× 131 1.0× 82 1.6× 12 0.4× 14 337
Wen‐Ying Wang Taiwan 6 378 1.3× 35 0.3× 117 0.9× 35 0.7× 59 2.2× 8 445
Gerhard Kristandl United Kingdom 6 233 0.8× 29 0.2× 152 1.2× 29 0.6× 41 1.5× 14 342
Roger Meuwissen Netherlands 12 119 0.4× 56 0.4× 305 2.4× 27 0.5× 34 1.3× 27 399

Countries citing papers authored by Jan‐Erik Gröjer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan‐Erik Gröjer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan‐Erik Gröjer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan‐Erik Gröjer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan‐Erik Gröjer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan‐Erik Gröjer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan‐Erik Gröjer. The network helps show where Jan‐Erik Gröjer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan‐Erik Gröjer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan‐Erik Gröjer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan‐Erik Gröjer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan‐Erik Gröjer. Jan‐Erik Gröjer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Catasús, Bino, et al.. (2009). Construction of intellectual capital – the case of purchase analysis. Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche). 13(1). 61–76. 24 indexed citations
2.
Catasús, Bino, et al.. (2008). Boken om nyckeltal. 1 indexed citations
3.
Catasús, Bino, et al.. (2007). What gets measured gets … on indicating, mobilizing and acting. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal. 20(4). 505–521. 81 indexed citations
4.
Catasús, Bino & Jan‐Erik Gröjer. (2006). Indicators: on visualizing, classifying and dramatizing. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 7(2). 187–203. 47 indexed citations
5.
Ahonen, Guy & Jan‐Erik Gröjer. (2005). Social Accounting in the Nordic Countries : From Social Accounting Towards Accounting in a Social Context. 43–60. 12 indexed citations
6.
Catasús, Bino & Jan‐Erik Gröjer. (2003). Intangibles and credit decisions: results from an experiment. European Accounting Review. 12(2). 327–355. 37 indexed citations
7.
Gröjer, Jan‐Erik. (2001). Intangibles and accounting classifications. Accounting Organizations and Society. 26(7-8). 695–713. 82 indexed citations
8.
Gröjer, Jan‐Erik & Ulf Johanson. (1998). Current development in human resource costing and accounting. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal. 11(4). 495–506. 60 indexed citations
9.
Gröjer, Jan‐Erik. (1997). Employee Artefacts on the Balance Sheet: Model Illustration and Implications. 2(1). 27–53. 17 indexed citations
10.
Gröjer, Jan‐Erik, et al.. (1978). Contabilidad Social: una tentativa sueca. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 21–32. 3 indexed citations
11.
Gröjer, Jan‐Erik, et al.. (1977). Social accounting: A Swedish attempt. Accounting Organizations and Society. 2(4). 349–385. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026