Thomas Carrington
- Accounting top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Public Administration top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Bino CatasúsKim Klarskov JeppesenKristin Reichborn‐KjennerudÅge JohnsenJarmo VakkuriPeter ÖhmanTobias JohanssonBelén González
- Topics
- Accounting and Organizational Management (10 papers)Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (6 papers)Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Thomas Carrington
12 papers receiving 256 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Accounting 154
- Management Information Systems 112
- Strategy and Management 68
- Public Administration 65
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 56
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Carrington
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Carrington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Carrington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Carrington more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Carrington
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Carrington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Carrington. The network helps show where Thomas Carrington may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Carrington
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Carrington. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Carrington based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Carrington. Thomas Carrington is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | Consulting or holding to account? : The Swedish National Audit Office as an agent of change in public administration | 2 |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | IFRS : Dilemman och utmaningar | 1 |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | The organisational context of professionalism in auditing | 4 |
| 10 | Den nya affärsredovisningen | 0 |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | Vad är revision | 0 |
| 13 | 73 | |
| 14 | Framing Audit Failure : Four studies on audit quality discomforts | 2 |
| 15 | 21 |
About Thomas Carrington
Thomas Carrington is a scholar working on Public Administration, Management Information Systems and Accounting, having authored 15 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting and Organizational Management (10 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (6 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (65 citations), Accounting (154 citations) and Management Information Systems (112 citations). Thomas Carrington has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Bino Catasús, Kim Klarskov Jeppesen, Kristin Reichborn‐Kjennerud, Åge Johnsen, Jarmo Vakkuri, Peter Öhman, Tobias Johansson, Belén González, Enrico Bracci and James C. Hathaway. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Accounting Research, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal and The British Accounting Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.