Benjamin Motz

1.2k citations
36 papers · 631 indexed · h-index 13

Benjamin Motz

32 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers

Benjamin Motz
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Computer Science Applications 102
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 199
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 138
  • General Decision Sciences 15
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 128
Replace Jessika Golle with:
Jessika Golle Germany
Samuel P. León Spain
Anita R. Bowles United States
Christopher A. Was United States
Elisabeth Norman Norway
Samuel T. Moulton United States
David Bridges United Kingdom
Sophie Bridgers United States
Peter Shell United States
Tengfei Wang China
Benjamin Motz relative to Jessika Golle Germany Jessika Golle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jessika Golle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Motz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Motz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Motz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Motz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Motz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Motz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Motz. The network helps show where Benjamin Motz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Motz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Motz Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Motz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20240
3 20234
4 20234
5 20231
6 20231
7 202315
8 20228
9 20201
10 20201
11
Finding Topics in Enrollment Data.
20183
12 20170
13 201712
14 201616
15
Effectiveness of Learner-Regulated Study Sequence: An in-vivo study in Introductory Psychology course.
20150
16 2015158
17 201520
18 201313
19 20134
20 200573

About Benjamin Motz

Benjamin Motz is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education and Information Systems and Management, having authored 36 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online Learning and Analytics (12 papers), Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (4 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (2 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (102 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (199 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (138 citations), General Decision Sciences (15 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (128 citations). Benjamin Motz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Joshua R. de Leeuw, Jeffrey R. Alberts, Rafael Núñez, Ursina Teuscher, Joshua Quick, Robert L. Goldstone, Paulo F. Carvalho, Jeffrey C. Schank, Samuel B. Day and Noah L. Schroeder. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Learning Analytics, Behavior Research Methods, PLoS ONE, Online Learning and Brain and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026